PDA

View Full Version : Just a Bit of Progress?


bobpbx
12-04-06, 09:53 PM
Scenic Vista Destroyed in Preservation District

Over 25 years ago, studies were commissioned to determine the boundaries of the most critical of all New Jersey Pineland areas; the Preservation District. It was this area that would receive the most protection, with the goal being to define and maintain a wilderness to be enjoyed and appreciated by future generations. The studies included surveys involving our NJ citizens to try and determine what is it about certain scenic aspects of the Pinelands that most appealed to them. Naturally, when shown a slide of a smokestack next to a slide of a Cedar tree forest, the citizens chose the forest. One scenic vista consistently came out on top in the survey; that of any type of waterway with trees in the background. Of course you say, that is in short supply in NJ and pleasing to the eye. With this and other data such as endangered species and water protection in mind, the lines for the Preservation District were drawn up and rules delineating their use were drafted in stone (or so we would like to think).

Fast forward 25 years later, and we see a disturbing trend of total disregard for the aesthetic standards that helped protect these scenic areas. None is more apparent than the recent decision to allow a cell tower against the backdrop of the cedar forest bordering pristine Bamber Lake in Lacey Township. The water entering Bamber Lake rises from a stretch of forest that extends for 10 miles without any sort of habitable dwelling. The Chamberlin Branch and Webbs Mill Branch join just upstream of the lake; both waterways are crystal clear and absolutely virgin. It is not enough to call them unpolluted, they are exceptional, and are they on the list for Category One status-the best of the best. To construct a cell phone tower in full view of the citizens who come to enjoy the lake waters and the natural surroundings is obscene, and violates everything the Preservation District stands for. The photograph attached to this opinion is undeniable proof of that fact.

You might ask how this happened, and who’s property the tower was constructed on. The tower was constructed on a working sand and gravel pit owned by a Lacey Township Committeeman. The tower was permitted by the Pinelands Commission, and the reason it was allowed is quite shaky. It was allowed to replace a local communication facility tower that was supposedly used to communicate with the truck drivers. The tower it replaces was 125 feet high according to the permit. The new tower is 180 feet high. The old tower could not be seen from the Lake, and one wonders whether it would have even if it were higher (no one can define just where it was).

No matter. The reason it was allowed is totally immaterial to the argument that the offending symbol of dubious progress changes the beautiful uniqueness of the lake forever. There is no record of Bamber Lake residents being asked if they would like a cell tower in this area. No longer will they enjoy the lake for its scenic beauty as before. No longer will they canoe up the gently waterway that enters the lake without having the to bear the cold symbol of greed that can be found in the bank accounts of Nextel and Cingular (and others). What we wanted from our Township and our Pinelands Commission is scenic beauty. We had it for 25 blessed years. Now, in 2006, we only seem to get the shaft. Could they have come up with a better location? Sure, just ask me. I can tell them where to stick it.

Bobpbx
Bamber Lake

http://forums.njpinebarrens.com/gallery/albums/userpics/10011/Cell_Tower.jpg

bruset
12-04-06, 10:06 PM
I think that's going a bit overboard. Sure, it sticks out but I would hardly say it ruins the lake.

In any case, we can trade houses, Bob. I'd sure love to live where you live, spoiled lake or not. :)

bobpbx
12-04-06, 10:37 PM
I think that's going a bit overboard. Sure, it sticks out but I would hardly say it ruins the lake.

In any case, we can trade houses, Bob. I'd sure love to live where you live, spoiled lake or not. :)

But, if you did live here, you might think differently. But ruining the view is not the whole story or complaint. Its the way they did it, in the dead of night so to speak, in the Preservation District, which is protected for all of us. Not to enrichen some yo-yo who owns the sand plant (who has already made money tearing up the pines). If they put it down the road at his buddy's sand plant, no one would even have noticed it.

BEHR655
12-04-06, 10:50 PM
We're used to seeing that kind of thing in the areas we live in. To Bob, that thing is sticking up like a middle finger at him.

Steve

TeeGate
12-04-06, 11:17 PM
Where I live they actually put one up basically right in the middle of the development on the property of a local business. At first I was really annoyed, but now I ride by it and don't even think about it. When I reach for my phone it works.

I see where Bob is coming from, but there could be worse things by the lake.

I wish it wasn't there for you Bob.


Guy

bruset
12-04-06, 11:19 PM
Yeah, I do agree with Bob that the way that it went up is pretty sneaky.

I still want to trade houses, though!

woodjin
12-05-06, 07:58 AM
I know where you are coming from Bob. I remember you pointing that out to me a few months back when I stopped by that time. It is a real shame. I don't know what the pineland comprehensive Management Plan requirements and restrictions would apply in this case. It might be worth looking into. The preservation area should be pretty restrictive. Have you considered getting a petition together from other Bamber residents....probably wouldn't do much good now that it is built. Sucks.

As a side note; shouldn't there be some places that we can't get cell phone reception. Wouldn't it be nice to be really alone now and then, away from the long arm of civilization. Know what I mean. Maybe I'm just a romantic but I like the idea. There is a spot in Wharton where you can't get any radio stations, at least without a lot of static. Thats when you know your away from civilization.

Jeff

bobpbx
12-05-06, 08:08 AM
As a side note; shouldn't there be some places that we can't get cell phone reception. Wouldn't it be nice to be really alone now and then, away from the long arm of civilization. Know what I mean. Maybe I'm just a romantic but I like the idea. Jeff

I like the idea too, we'll have to go to Canada I guess. By the way, when Steve and I were way out in the middle of the West Plains Saturday, he got a phone call no problem. He spent the next 15 minutes talking to some guy about the sale at Macy's that evening, and whether or not they could beat the crowds to pick through the colorful silk underwear going on sale.

:mrgreen:

RednekF350
12-05-06, 01:31 PM
One of the things I like about saltwater fishing is that as soon as I am 12-15 miles off, the cell phone will not work.
Hardcore offshore guys have satellite phones that have no distance to land limits.
I don't venture more than 25 from port and the VHF still works ship to ship and ship to shore.

woodjin
12-06-06, 08:13 AM
Ahhhh, so there are some kindred spirits.

NewSchoolPiney
12-08-06, 06:32 PM
As a side note; shouldn't there be some places that we can't get cell phone reception. Wouldn't it be nice to be really alone now and then, away from the long arm of civilization. Know what I mean. Maybe I'm just a romantic but I like the idea. There is a spot in Wharton where you can't get any radio stations, at least without a lot of static. Thats when you know your away from civilization.

Jeff

I've found all it takes is a little will power. Turn off your phone if you don't want to be contacted. Even though I'm 25 and I went through the cell phone/tech revolution, you'd think I'd be ecstatic about cell phones like the rest of America. I treat my phone like a house line/emergency beacon. If I'm out somewhere, I turn it off. If I'm home, I turn it on. If you look at it as a "mobile land line" then you won't be as enslaved by it like a lot of people are.

Also, I do find that this is disturbing to have cell phone towers everywhere. I think "Wilderness Areas" should be defined to exclude visual technological disturbances. If we let these things "slide in", soon we forget and the next visual disturbance comes along and we forget about the original ones.

Not most of us here, of course. Hell, why would we be part of such a great community if we wanted it to be littered with eye sores and metal structures?

Peace,

Justin