Timber and Taxes

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
25,956
8,703
All,

This is a subject that I am pretty confident we have not discussed before. I recently received a publication in the mail from a publisher that I have a separate subscription to for a different magazine. I am still uncertain why he sent this to me but I have some idea's. This particular publication is strictly for land owners who plan on selling or managing the timber that is on their property. One section of the magazine answers questions concerning taxes.... in particular the new Net Investment Income tax of 3.8 percent. This tax applies to single taxpayers with an adjusted gross income of more than $200,000, or couples with more than $250,000 of adjusted gross income, and apparently must be a passive business asset. I am not an expert at this but the way I see it is the land owners in the Pine Barrens such as Haines and others must have to pay this tax when the timber on their land is taken with no work on their part. I assume that would mean if a forester is hired to remove timber the tax must be paid.

Now here is what really interested me about this tax. It became effective on January 1, 2013 and was enacted as part of the 2010 healthcare reform law. If anyone wondered how low income individuals can get healthcare so cheap this is why. Semi affluent or affluent landowners who try to make a dime on the timber they own are being taxed to pay for it. Nothing is free in this world and anytime large groups of individuals get money from the government for free, someone is paying the price.

Guy
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trailwalker

h2ochild

Scout
Nov 24, 2010
83
57
69
Bass River Township
"Tax the rich to feed the poor" is certainly not a new idea, nor is it constrained to just one side of the aisle in American politics. Unfortunately "The Taxpayers" continue to elect and install persons who will do just that. As a jaundiced voter, I can only think we must want the status quo. Why else would these persons continually be elected?
So many taxes, and this one being discussed, are just plain wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Menantico
Jul 12, 2006
1,354
344
Gloucester City, NJ
Continue to elect anyone of either of the two parties and this is what you'll get, every time. It's time to break the cycle and elect that person with good common sense, no corporate backing and no personal debts to repay due to his/her election. That's what will get this country back on track. People continue to do the same thing (elect someone from one of the two parties) and expect different results. I think Einstein or someone like him said that's the definition of insanity, doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Menantico
Top