Bob, I assume you are referring to the willow oak. Here is that oak as of this evening.I opened up the registry and saw there's one 21 feet in circumference.
The registry has photos when it was still alive,
Bob, I assume you are referring to the willow oak. Here is that oak as of this evening.I opened up the registry and saw there's one 21 feet in circumference.
I recall bringing some leaves home (I think), may get to them tomorrow. Preliminarily, I have a book that matched it up to Populus grandidentata.Looks like quaking aspen
Yeah, that looks bigger than the one I saw. Quite a tree.Bob, I assume you are referring to the willow oak. Here is that oak as of this evening.
View attachment 22676
The registry has photos when it was still alive,
Are you going with Pitch Pine, John?Their fingertips are just touching on the other side. We want to go back to measure it.
View attachment 22680
That’s what was thinking but I need to get a better look at the needles. It’s size just stood out from everything else in the area.Are you going with Pitch Pine, John?
I dug out the leaves German. I'm going with Populus grandidentata. The young leaves are tomentose beneath, and the Quaking aspen is glaucous beneath with finer marginal teeth.Looks like quaking aspen
Seeing the leaves, I'm sure you are rightI dug out the leaves German. I'm going with Populus grandidentata. The young leaves are tomentose beneath, and the Quaking aspen is glaucous beneath with finer marginal teeth.
View attachment 22685
You beat me too it.Actually, circumference should be measured at 4.5 feet from the ground (AKA breast height), and on the uphill side if on a slope. It may seem like a nit-picky difference but consistent height is nessesary for comparative measurements.
I'll have to familiarize myself with them more. That is a very squat cone. I will keep an eye out for them.While you're working in Cape May, see if you can find a Pond Pine.
I think there are a few at Bennett's bog but I wasn't ever positive.