Abandoned Cranberry Bogs Are Being Brought Back to Life

Ben Ruset

Administrator
Site Administrator
Oct 12, 2004
7,616
1,863
Monmouth County
www.benruset.com
http://www.app.com/app/story/0,21625,1115075,00.html

Published in the Asbury Park Press 11/17/04
By KIRK MOORE
STAFF WRITER
CHATSWORTH -- Hopscotching over piles of soil and sand, Emile DeVito stepped on drying clumps of cranberry vines. His feet landed with a solid thud, in a spot just inches from a newly dug pond.

"It's hard as concrete," he said, tapping the surface with his heel. "The modern cranberry bog is like a pool table, with pipes underneath."

A few yards away, New Jersey Conservation Foundation staffers Louis Cantafio and Tim Morris stripped out the circulatory system of the former A.R. DeMarco Co. cranberry farm, hoisting plastic irrigation pipes with the same blue-green hue as the day they were buried in 1997.

When it purchased the 9,400-acre DeMarco property late last year, the conservation foundation inherited one of the bigger freshwater wetlands violation problems in New Jersey: a 22-acre bog that cranberry grower J. Garfield DeMarco built in the late 1990s, before a glut of frozen fruit and free-falling prices plunged the industry into a deep recession.

Now, foundation biologists are using a rented backhoe and an Army surplus dump truck to accomplish an innovative wetlands restoration. They hope to bring back the Pole Branch of the Wading River, once famed among naturalists as the home of rare plant and animal species.

"This area was obliterated in the late 1950s, early '60s. There were no rules, so they could do what they wanted," said DeVito, director of science and land management for the conservation foundation, as he strode along a dirt road atop a dike separating two bogs.

After family patriarch Anthony DeMarco started buying land around Chatsworth in the 1940s, he built cranberry bogs the traditional way, roughly leveling native wetlands soil before planting cranberry vines, DeVito said.

Although the old Pole Branch channel still lies in those bogs, most of the water was diverted to a ditch -- except when it is let into the bog to float berries during the fall harvest, or to protect the vines from freezing weather, he explained.

"These still have the native soil," DeVito said, pointing to older bogs on the east side of the dike. "In this bog, you plug the ditches, let them fill up, and it turns back into a wetland."
On the west side of the dike, according to the state Department of Environmental Protection, DeMarco's son Garfield had illegally converted wetlands to cranberry culture without a permit -- a charge that DeMarco contested, but ultimately settled last January with a $400,000 penalty.

Modern bogs are surveyed with laser transits and graded to within a fraction of an inch to conserve water, their native hydric soils replaced with a mixture of soil and sand covering drainage and irrigation pipes, DeVito said.

That created a set of problems for the wetland restorers. When soil experts from the U.S. Department of Agriculture came out to look over the bog with DeVito, they saw construction activities on the bog had the unintended consequence of compacting the new sand-soil mix, said Chris Smith, a USDA soil scientist.

"When a wetland is compacted like that, the water is on top of the soil, rather than in it," Smith said. "My recommendation to them was to loosen the the surface without cutting into the lower layers that help hold the water."

"We were concerned, not so much about tainting the (land purchase) project, but about our ability to take on the restoration," said Michele Byers, the conservation foundation's executive director.

Just before closing the deal, DeMarco and his family agreed to give the foundation a further $400,000 discount, on a purchase price already around half the property's potential market value. That dropped the final figure to $11.6 million, Byers said.

Initial bids to contract the job out came back around $700,000 to $800,000 but by doing the work themselves, foundation staffers say the cost will be around $50,000 for equipment and rentals, not counting their own full-time work.

They cleared the massive sand table-top from the bog, digging and running "root rake" machinery to break up the soil down to around 18 inches deep, without disturbing clay-bearing lower layers that keep water up near the surface, DeVito said.

Cantafio, who has a doctorate degree in genetics, drove a six-wheel dump truck that the foundation bought from a military vehicle collector in Philadelphia. He hauled back the muck that DeMarco removed, dumping piles of black soil all over.

DeVito wants the result "to look like an English muffin," with humps and holes to create a variety of water levels for different plant species. Cantafio and Morris are careful to avoid squashing shrubs, and they've replanted some in a fenced patch, safe from hungry deer, so bluebirds and cedar waxwings will spread the seeds.

Lessons from the project could point the way toward restoring other abandoned cranberry bogs. Closed down after the industry's earlier economic shakeouts, small bogs returning to nature dot the region, from northern Ocean County across the state to the Philadelphia suburbs.

"But no one knows what will happen if these modern bogs are abandoned, the way a lot of bogs were abandoned after World War II," DeVito said. "We couldn't just fill this back up with water and say it's a wetland again."
 

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
25,602
8,180
That area in 40 years will look just like Friendship Bogs or Rockwood looks today. If anyone has not been there you should check it out. It never will look like it does now again.

I have the GPS coordinates of where we took our group photo, and a few other spots, which will make a nice Then and Now photo when I am 90. If I make it :)

A wonderful place!

Guy
 

bobpbx

Piney
Staff member
Oct 25, 2002
14,153
4,258
Pines; Bamber area
TeeGate said:
That area in 40 years will look just like Friendship Bogs or Rockwood looks today. If anyone has not been there you should check it out. It never will look like it does now again.

I have the GPS coordinates of where we took our group photo, and a few other spots, which will make a nice Then and Now photo when I am 90. If I make it :)

A wonderful place!

Guy

When I was there last week Luis was ripping up the pipes. I did not go over and bother him. You should start a photo file on that section Guy. It is close to 563. You wanna go out there tomorrow and poke around a bit? See what they're doing?
 

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
25,602
8,180
BobM said:
When I was there last week Luis was ripping up the pipes. I did not go over and bother him. You should start a photo file on that section Guy. It is close to 563. You wanna go out there tomorrow and poke around a bit? See what they're doing?

I can't Bob. I have to go to a birthday party for my brother-in-laws 2 year old. I have to go to Chester PA for food, back to my house, and then down to Glassboro. It will take up most of the day. I am sorry since I would really like to do that.

Guy
 

bobpbx

Piney
Staff member
Oct 25, 2002
14,153
4,258
Pines; Bamber area
TeeGate said:
I can't Bob. I have to go to a birthday party for my brother-in-laws 2 year old. Guy

I'm hip to that Guy. A party for a 2 year old is okay, its when they get to be 5 or 6 and you still get an invite as a 35 year old like I did is when it starts to suck.

They usually hold them in the middle of a sunny day, like 2pm. Then we trudge in to the house for 2 hours of yelling and screaming. What a great time I have :rolleyes:. I needed to wear a bumper sticker on my tee shirt; "I'd rather be elswhere".

I put my foot down hard. There were several close relatives I had that felt slighted when I told them I don't attend birthday parties for kids after a certain age. Called me anti-social.
 
BobM said:
I'm hip to that Guy. A party for a 2 year old is okay, its when they get to be 5 or 6 and you still get an invite as a 35 year old like I did is when it starts to suck.

They usually hold them in the middle of a sunny day, like 2pm. Then we trudge in to the house for 2 hours of yelling and screaming. What a great time I have :rolleyes:. I needed to wear a bumper sticker on my tee shirt; "I'd rather be elswhere".

I put my foot down hard. There were several close relatives I had that felt slighted when I told them I don't attend birthday parties for kids after a certain age. Called me anti-social.


So I guess it sucks that I'm going to a birthday party for a 6 year old today? :D
Actually, I'd rather go to a 6 year old's party than a 2 year old's. Their toys are cooler. :D
 

Ben Ruset

Administrator
Site Administrator
Oct 12, 2004
7,616
1,863
Monmouth County
www.benruset.com
BobM said:
I'm hip to that Guy. A party for a 2 year old is okay, its when they get to be 5 or 6 and you still get an invite as a 35 year old like I did is when it starts to suck.

Start showing up in an 85 GMC van, hand out a lot of candy, and wear a trenchcoat. That should get the invites down...
 
Top