Early Morning Search for the Second Inscribed Rockwood Stone

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
25,951
8,694
All,

This morning before 7AM I was at Dave Amato’s house with Rob who I work with, on a mission that has been a few years in the making. But first let me start from the beginning for the new members who missed what I am about to explain.

If you have Beck’s "More Forgotten Towns of South Jersey", get it off the shelf and read chapter 30 titled “Nothin’ in Nothin In Rockwood”. If you don’t have it I will help you out below.

While reading that chapter years ago, I was fascinated when reading Beck’s account of his visit there in the mid 30’s. He encountered the Fords who were running the bogs at Rockwood for Haines and were not knowledgeable on the history of Rockwood.


main.php


So in 2004 things finally came together where it appeared I would find out if the stone(s) were still there. After a month of leg work, and help from RednekF350, I learn there were quite a few of them, and I felt it best to ask for some help. So on 11/23/04 Steve (Behr655) and I spent the day roaming the swamps of Rockwood for these elusive stones. Most of the day was somewhat disappointing, and our time was running out. Our last stop was the hardest to reach and we were exhausted. Walking round and round in circles at this location and finding nothing was disappointing. We squatted down to rest since there was nothing nearby that wasn't wet, and as we stood to leave, Steve tripped over something in the weeds.


main.php




main.php




Since then Ben’s research, along with mine on Rockwood has taken us as far as New York City. I wanted to know more about the Rockwood family and town that the Fords knew little about, but was content in knowing that I had found the last remaining stone. But had I?

Recently while looking over some old maps, I found one that was different than the others I had viewed. It alleged that I had missed one, farther away from where Steve and I had been looking. The question was is it still there since I had been disappointed how many had not been. So I decided to do what I prefer to do best, and that is search, which brings us to this morning before 7AM.

Our first stop was Dave Amato’s house to take more photo’s and look the place over more. Then off to look for the stone. Even though it was going to 50 today, at 7AM it was 25. Everywhere we walked was water about to go over our boots, and ice that as water flowed over it became like glass. Walking was slow and cautious all of the way. A few deer stands, beaver activity, and water everywhere. Finally we reach the location. Peering into the water we saw nothing! We jumped from stump to stump until we seemed trapped. Discussion ensued and we decided to go just a little bit farther. I was trapped and had to backtrack somewhat and Rob was able to move ahead. Suddenly a yell from him and the day was all worth while. There is a second inscribed Rockwood stone don’t you know!




In the center of the photo.

main.php





main.php




Rob taking a photo of it

main.php





We arrived home by 9:45AM, the day complete for me :) The mysteries of Rockwood are becoming less and less.


Guy
 

bobpbx

Piney
Staff member
Oct 25, 2002
14,658
4,835
Pines; Bamber area
Very neat Guy. I wonder just how many people have been there since, say, 1900. Probably not many but perhaps a wayward hunter. Nice find.
 

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
25,951
8,694
It has been a while since anyone has been there Bob. The top was completlyblack with the text not showing. I had to wash it off with my spare pair of socks which should have been on my feet. We got really wet today in our boots.

Actually, once I washed it off it was hard to see the text also, so i got leaves and rubbed it into the cavities. That darkened up the letters.

Thank you all for the kind words. I love finding these stones. A little piece of history.

Guy
 

wolfspider05

Explorer
Nov 12, 2004
223
12
40
Riverside Nj
Awesome find guys! Good work

I have one question (please correct me if I am wrong).

I am guessing that the stones marked with the year 1871 are gone? And that means that there are or were stones with different dates? I am interested
 

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
25,951
8,694
Awesome find guys! Good work

I have one question (please correct me if I am wrong).

I am guessing that the stones marked with the year 1871 are gone? And that means that there are or were stones with different dates? I am interested

I suspect that Ford misread the dates. He thought it was a one and it was a seven. With that said Ford was not the only one to do this. So confusion has occurred in the past. But I have visited all of the known locations and there are only two surviving and they both say 1877. There is another but it has been damaged to the point that it is no longer inscribed. There should have been some that say 1888 also, but they are not there.

Guy
 
Top