Exploring a Different Area of Wharton

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
26,003
8,769
Thanks to everyone for their comments. I have again been neglecting to say that. Sorry.


Guy
 

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
26,003
8,769
All,

I thought I would go into a little more detail on what I have been doing in this area, and hopefully some of you will find it interesting. I have been trying to find out as much as I can about the parcel of land shown in the below link. Notice the lines surrounding the red target symbol.


http://www.topozone.com/map.asp?lat=39.79581&lon=-74.80993&datum=nad27&u=4&layer=DRG&size=m&s=24

As I mentioned this property was once owned by Jesse S. Braddock of Medford. He was married in June 1856 to Rachel Ann Evans of Marlton. The Evans family were prominent Marlton residents who owned the bogs where Kings Grant is now. They also were involved with Friendship Bogs along with the Wills Family. I am uncertain if Rachel Evans was from that line of the family, but I suspect she was. There is a member of this site who may answer that here one day.

Jesse Braddock died at the age of 64 on December, 7 1895, and his wife Rachel lived to the age of 72 and passed away on Sept 11th 1904. Does Sept 11 and Dec 7 mean anything to you? :) An interesting coincidence!


Since I did not have the exact location of this property, I used an educated guess on where the corners would be, and Rob and I found the first stone on our hike a week ago. To refresh here is that photo.


IMG_0217.JPG




Once I find one stone and have a bearing and distance to another one, it is quite easy to find the rest, except physically finding them in the woods. I have acquired the below survey showing the info I needed to do just that. Now take notice of three things in the below photo. First, on the left it says “Beginning stone in coal pit bottom”, and just to the right is a small triangular tract. And just above that is penciled in “Does not show on tax map”. This coal pit stone is what Rob and I was looking for when I lost my stick. The line that comes down on an angle from the top of the map and creates that small triangle is the Medford and Shamong boundary line, with Shamong on the right and Medford on the left. So we now know that for some reason the Medford portion of this property did not show on tax maps, and I was wondering if because the property was not fully surveyed, maybe the property did not actually extend into Medford, and I wanted to find that out.

survey.jpg



So today using the info from that map, and our find the week before, Jessica and I traveled yet again there to find that stone. In minutes I found it in semi dense woods that one would never have known at one time had been a coal pit.


IMG_0261.JPG




In order to get an idea of what that area looked like in the 1930’s, I made this “Then and Now” showing this area in 1930 and today.


then_now.jpg



Next I needed to find one more stone to be able to get a good idea of the actual property location. Almost 800 feet away we found it flat on the ground along a path.


IMG_0263.JPG



A search for the fourth was unsuccessful today, so next weekend I will be there again. However, I had found enough of them to accurately see how much of that property extended into Medford. Sure enough the survey map above is quite accurate which you can see by this map. The triangle on the left proves that this property did indeed extend into Medford Township.


aerial.tiff


Guy
 

bobpbx

Piney
Staff member
Oct 25, 2002
14,715
4,898
Pines; Bamber area
You know Guy, I think he picked up that property only to pull all the cedar out. Even so, tis an odd piece of property. Does the state own it now?
 

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
26,003
8,769
You know Guy, I think he picked up that property only to pull all the cedar out. Even so, tis an odd piece of property. Does the state own it now?

There are no cedar on this parcel and I doubt there ever was. They are nearby.

As for being private that is an interesting question. According to the text on the right of the survey, the state acquired it since it mentions an acquisition number. I know who wrote "private" on it and have doubts that is correct.


Guy
 

bobpbx

Piney
Staff member
Oct 25, 2002
14,715
4,898
Pines; Bamber area
There are no cedar on this parcel and I doubt there ever was. They are nearby.

Often, when Cedar is clearcut, which the 1931 photo shows (something was), then the hardwoods take over. So there very well may have been cedar there. It was always wet, so I doubt they went in there to get pitch pine, because it would not have been in there.
 

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
26,003
8,769

relayer

Explorer
Guy

Thanks for the plug. I'll take all the help I can get.

Thanks also for the thread. I don't usually gush (I usually leave that to program hosts on HGTV and Discovery Home) but really, what you do just amazes the heck out of me. One of these days you might want to think about producing a book or something. Really, really good.

relayer
 

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
26,003
8,769
Relayer,

Glad to give you the plug, and thank you for the kind words. One day I will get that book made, but I am not sure if anyone would buy something that apparently only interests me and a few others. My hobby is not mainstream for sure.

Guy
 

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
26,003
8,769
We returned to look for the final stone and could not find it. I suspect since it was along a path it is gone. We did make a second search for stones at a very small parcel nearby, and came up with the state marker and the stone.

IMG_0267.JPG



IMG_0269.JPG


While returning to the car we found an old bridge that at one time allowed vehicle traffic across a stream. There is evidence of a road being there on one side of the bridge, but no evidence on the other. It has been a long while since this has been in use.


IMG_0276.JPG



Guy
 
Top