BEHR655 said:I have to agree with Guy. Any place that is impossible for any vehicle to drive to.
Steve
TeeGate said:Enjoy it now, but one day you may find as I have that there are more choices than just the fork in the road.
Guy
00xj54 said:Haha Not me. Since I'm one of the Jeep guys.
woodjin said:the forked river mountains
Boyd said:A bit off-topic, but I'm curious as to why you guys tend to say "Forked River Mountains" in the plural? Is that intentional? Of course it conjures up visions of a vast mountain range, but I think there is only one place that could be considered a "mountain," and even that requires a stretch of the imagination Or have I missed something in my wanderings through that area?
The state and Nature Conservancy favor the singular version:
http://www.state.nj.us/dep/fgw/pdf/wmamaps/forked_river_mountain.pdf
http://www.nature.org/wherewework/northamerica/states/newjersey/work/art15459.html
woodjin said:Vehicles vs. foot travel
I can't help but think of the pines in the Macro and the Micro (sorry, fomer economics major). I started off my interest in the Macro: on a motorcyle mostly trying to cover as much ground as possible, trying to get the big picture, trying to get a sense of where everything was in relation to itself. Apple pie hill, the forked river mountains, the panoramic. Then as time went on I began to get into the micro: bushwacking, fishing, study of the flora and fauna, geology and history. It is amazing how 50 square feet of the pines can be as interesting as 50 square miles. You can see it through a telescrope or a microscope. Both approaches are fullfilling and worth while, and both provide tremendous opportunity for discovery.
Jeff