I'm curious as to what is going to prevent erosion from heavy rains, now that it's all loose soil, being only packed down by vehicles. I wonder if the plans include rip rap? I know I'm not a big fan of change, but it is just plain ugly.
Did you take any pictures? I would like to see what it looks like now.
Looking at some year-old pictures I have, I agree, the area between the two spillways doesn't really look like a dam. (Where they cut at Lake Absegami does, especially with the trees removed. The ground drops off on both sides - one side to the lake, and the other side to the low area where East Branch Bass River flows. It's clearly a dam.)
But at Harrisville, in fact it probably is considered a dam - meaning it is man-made and holds the lake in. So I think the trees were cut not to protect the spillways (outflows), but to protect the earth dams.
Thanks for doing the legwork and finding an answer. I guess it was just a matter of time.Found the official explanation, from the NJ Bureau of Dam Safety
Possibly due to the August 19, 1939 flood - photo at HarrisvilleAnyone know why the spillways were installed? Except for when the lake was filling, the flow downstream is not changed once it reached the top of the spillway's. Why not just a bridge, which was required anyway?
http://maps.njpinebarrens.com/#lat=39.66466143397265&lng=-74.52391668385741&z=16&type=nj1930&gpx=
That's the same event that washed out the tracks and caused the Blue Comet to derail.Possibly due to the August 19, 1939 flood - photo at Harrisville View attachment 9257
He's not the only one. I was talking to a SPP officer last Sunday at Harrisville lake, he told me a lot of people are very upset over the treeA letter to the editor, Pine Barrens Tribute, about the Harrisiville Lake/Pond tree cutting:
http://pinebarrenstribune.com/lette...ree-removal-at-harrisville-lake-p1164-117.htm
The writer seems a little upset...
I can only hope plans are in place to re-vegetate the banks.
The writer does seem to be upset. The fact is those trees should have been taken out years ago. After years of neglect the DEP is now addressed the problem. As I mentioned before the failure of so many dams in the rain event in 2004 caused a state wide survey of why and how it can be prevented. Granted getting 14" or more of rain in a day had a lot to do with it.A letter to the editor, Pine Barrens Tribute, about the Harrisiville Lake/Pond tree cutting:
http://pinebarrenstribune.com/lette...ree-removal-at-harrisville-lake-p1164-117.htm
The writer seems a little upset...
While it's not as scenic I'm glad it's being addressed. If that dam were to fail I would be surprised if it would be rebuilt. That would be a much worse scenario in my opinion.
Just speculating but I believe the reason Absegami and Harrisville were not cleared for decades was due to the low threat level assessment but there number unfortunately came up after all these years.I read that dams are classified as I, II, III, and IV based on their hazard potential. Failure of a Class I dam could cause loss of life or extensive property damage; Classs II failure could cause significant property damage; Class III is low hazard potential, and if a Class IV dam fails nobody would likely notice...
Does anyone know how to find out what a specific dam's classification is? I don't know if this is public information - I'm sure they could come up with an excuse to keep it secret - but it would be interesting to know.