New law in effect today

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
25,951
8,695
I hate any of these pedestrian laws. It is so much easier for a pedestrian to stop than a car. And when they just walk off the curb without looking, thinking they have the right to do this, it is a crime. And then when they are physically able to run or walk fast they walk like they could not care about anyone. This state is insane, and the fact that kids of today are being taught this annoys me even more.

Guy
 

Old Crazy

Explorer
Oct 13, 2007
481
94
Stinking Creek, NJ
You just have to contest that one in court. Call a newspaper to be there with you.

"The driver of a vehicle must stop and stay stopped for a pedestrian crossing the roadway within a marked crosswalk or within any unmarked crosswalk at an intersection, except at crosswalks when the movement of traffic is being regulated by police officers or traffic control signals, or where otherwise prohibited by municipal, county, or State regulation, and except where a pedestrian tunnel or overhead pedestrian crossing has been provided, but no pedestrian shall suddenly leave a curb or other place of safety and walk or run into the path of a vehicle which is so close that it is impossible for the driver to yield. Nothing contained herein shall relieve a pedestrian from using due care for his safety."


After this happened to me I was outraged. I wanted to check with the nearby businesses and see if a security camera had recorded what happened so I could use it as evidence to show that the undercover police officer that darted out in front of me had violated the very law I was issued a summons for by not exercising reasonable care before she attempted to cross the street. But after I calmed down and called my insurance company and was assured that because of my lengthy relationship with them and my spotless driving record that I would not incur an insurance surcharge for the two points, I decided to cut my losses and pay the $130 fine.

Fighting that ticket in court would have meant missing some work during a crucial time to make a 150 mile round trip ride to Salem, and my only defense in court would have been my version of the events that took place versus the police version. I would have almost certainly lost that battle. Then, in addition to the $130 fine, I would have also been assessed court costs of probably $100 and spent God knows how many torturous hours sitting on a wooden bench waiting for my case to be heard.

I have no ax to grind with the police. I've never been arrested in my life and prior to this incident I hadn't received a traffic ticket in almost 20 years. I have friends and clients who are in law enforcement and, like most people in law enforcement, they're decent, honest, hard working people who risk their lives to do a job most of us wouldn't want to do. But I have to tell you, it's a really lousy feeling when the police do something unethical for an ulterior motive to give out lots of traffic citations and you end up as one of their victims.

I suspect the ulterior motive of the husband and wife duo on the Salem police department who cooked up this crosswalk sting to expose the supposed danger they claimed drivers were subjecting pedestrians to at crosswalk's, was the front page article that was scheduled to appear in the local newspaper the following day and report on the results of their undercover operation. I guess they realized it was in their best interest to give out many tickets instead of just a few. Does anybody honestly believe that in just two hours on a 25mph street there could be 34 incidents of a driver nearly running down a pedestrian in a crosswalk?
 

Old Crazy

Explorer
Oct 13, 2007
481
94
Stinking Creek, NJ
It's his WIFE? See this just went from outrageous to Jimmy Kimmel territory. Please tell me this is all true so I can be the first to break it nationwide in a comedic format.

I was one of the 34 people who was issued a ticket in Salem, NJ on September 23, 2009. I did a google seach to see if I could find the newspaper article regarding this crosswalk sting and discovered the Salem police department ran this crosswalk sting again a month later and issued 97 tickets!

What a disgrace for a city to so blatantly use its police department to raise revenue. I went to Salem to purchase materials for my business. I will never make a purchase there again, and I suspect many of the other victims of this scam will likewise boycott Salem, NJ.


Here's a link to the article:

http://www.nj.com/salem/index.ssf/2009/10/salem_police_issue_97_tickets.html
 

imkms

Explorer
Feb 18, 2008
603
242
SJ and SW FL
I hate to break the news to you, but this law went into effect this April. If you paid a fine for violating it in 2009 you've been had.
I don't know if this is a new law, a wider spread or a modified version, but a friend of mine received a ticket in my town two or three years ago for the same thing, as did numerous others in what was an obvious sting by local police.
There were a lot of complaints in my town when the crosswalks first went live on Mian street, because many suspected pedestrian abuse would be common and turn what should be an extended two-way courteousy into a "screw you it's my right so you stop" mentality.
 
Top