Nothin' in Nothin' in Rockwood is not true!

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
25,642
8,250
From More Forgotten Towns of South Jersey, Chapter 30 (Nothin' in
Nothin' in Rockwood)

The Fords knew little of the history of Rockwood. They never bothered to
find out. What they told us, they assumed after surveying a marker
bearing the name of C. G. Rockwood, the original owner, with the date of
1871.






I wondered if those historic markers may still exist, and a few months
back I decided to see if I could find that out, and more importantly,
find them myself.

After receiving a tip on how I might do that, I made a phone call
leaving voice mail, and sat back and waited for a response. Nothing came
of it.

So I called again a week later and waited. Still nothing!

It became apparent that the phone was not going to work, and that I would
have to travel myself to get the info I needed to find this marker. A weekday
was required for this, and I decided an afternoon visit would be best.

I arrived at my destination on a Monday afternoon, only to find out that
I was not exactly at the correct place. The woman there made a few phone
calls, only to get the same results as I did. She said she would make
one more attempt to set me straight, when a car pulled into the
driveway. It turned out that I was about to meet the man who could, and did
help me out.

When you search for markers in the pines as I do, the weekends come
slow. Work seems unimportant, and boring. I was able to make it through
the week by pouring over the info I acquired, checking my facts over and
over again to get them right.

So at 9AM this morning I was parked on Rockwood road, standing next to
my car when Steve (Behr655) arrived. I had already done some preliminary
searching and had come up with a state marker. This would lead us
hopefully to one that we were searching for, but unfortunately it did not.

So we headed to our second location and faired much better. It did not
have any writing on it, but it was indeed a Rockwell marker from the 1800's.

http://mywebpages.comcast.net/islandtee/11202004/IMG_4591.jpg

Moving to the next location we found absolutely nothing, so we headed on.
We traveled down a path that as Steve mentioned would most certainly be
chigger filled in the summer, but nothing to worry about today. At the end
of the path the woods ahead of us was flowing with water, and our destination
was in the middle of it. We found that marker to also be
missing. A big disappointment! It unfortunately was very close to a path
where it could easily have been noticed many years earlier, and there
was also a possibility that since the water flow in the area was strong,
it could have been undermined. We continued on.

The path to this location was filled with briers, making our traveling
difficult. We decided to travel through the stream and then head toward
the river. It was tough going, wet, and hard on the body.

http://mywebpages.comcast.net/islandtee/11202004/IMG_4598.jpg

We arrived at the Sleeper creek to disappointment again. The water was
just flowing around us, with no chance that there could be anything
there. We decided to sit down on a piece of plastic to protect us from
the water and eat a snack before heading on.

Our final destination was extremely tough going where we had to travel
mostly in water. There were many moments that our hip waders had water
within inches of flowing down out legs. After what seemed forever we
arrived.

We found ourself in a savanna filled with water, with small trees
covering much of it. We started walking around in circles pushing our
way through the trees. Exhaustion was setting in on me when I decide to
call it quits. Steve who was right next to me stepped back to stand up
and slammed into something with his foot. He calmly told me we had found
it. Covered in grass and weeds, standing in water, having survived over
125 years, we had found one of the granite markers placed there by
C. G. Rockwell as mentioned in Beck's book. History is still in the pines!
You have to appreciate that!

The marker is in perfect shape, with as Beck mentions having the initials
C. G. R. on it. There is also a date on it but it is not 1871 as Beck had
described. This one says what I believe to be 1884 or possibly 1887.
I am leaning toward 1884 but that is not certain. A close look at it makes
it appear that someone had carved the number 6 in it, only to alter it to a 4
or a 7. You decide for yourself.


http://mywebpages.comcast.net/islandtee/11202004/IMG_4610.jpg

http://mywebpages.comcast.net/islandtee/11202004/IMG_4614.jpg

http://mywebpages.comcast.net/islandtee/11202004/IMG_4612.jpg

http://mywebpages.comcast.net/islandtee/11202004/IMG_4616.jpg

Guy
 

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
25,642
8,250
BEHR655 said:
Great report Guy. I'm still leaning to 1887.Tracing the number with my finger makes me believe it is a 7.

Steve

When the ground freezes over I will take Jessica to see it, and will try a pencil impression.

Guy
 

woodjin

Piney
Nov 8, 2004
4,341
327
Near Mt. Misery
That is really wild! I wonder how many years have passed between yourselves and the last person to have looked upon that marker. I wonder where the inconsistency in the date stems from; was it a mistake in the memory of the Fords as they relayed it to Beck, or did Beck make a mistake, or is the exact marker Beck was referring to one of the ones you didn't find. If so why would there be over a decade gap? Very cool, very interesting!! I'll have to revisit that chapter.
 

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
25,642
8,250
woodjin said:
That is really wild! I wonder how many years have passed between yourselves and the last person to have looked upon that marker. I wonder where the inconsistency in the date stems from; was it a mistake in the memory of the Fords as they relayed it to Beck, or did Beck make a mistake, or is the exact marker Beck was referring to one of the ones you didn't find. If so why would there be over a decade gap? Very cool, very interesting!! I'll have to revisit that chapter.

There were other stones that did have the 1871 and 1887 on it, but it appears they are no longer around. The information I dug up said that this particular one should have been the 1871 stone. Obviously, it is incorrect.

As for the last visitors to the stone, I can tell you that unless someone stumbled onto it, we were the first in 50 years.

Guy
 

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
25,642
8,250
gagliarchives said:
Guy, you are my idol. What a find.


Thank you, I appreciate that. There is nothing I enjoy more than searching for something in the pines like this. Steve can tell you that I can get somewhat intense, especially when we were not able to find it at first. I should say I get frustrated. But Steve made my day by stepping on it, and finding it makes it all worth while.

Also, it is inscribed 1887 and not 1884 as I earlier was thinking it may be. When I looked through the screen with my camera it looked just like a 4. That is the reason I was uncertain at the time.

I will be back there next summer when things dry up somewhat, searching at two locations we visited where there is a remote possibility the others may still be around.

Guy
 

gagliarchives

Explorer
Mar 7, 2004
254
0
gagliarchives.com
I need to get those waist length boots Guy. God only knows I won't ever under estimate the poison ivy attack I recieved this year. I want to come out with you guys when I get some, or at least while its below 60 LOL.
So was the marker in fairly good shape you had seen earlier? The one while you waited for Steve?

Tom

ps I found a cement marker one day on QBR and FORGOT my dam camera. I have driven down that road 11 times since that day to find it. Mazing stuff you find when you are peeing. Wonder if I will ever find it again.
 

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
25,642
8,250
I find it interesting! Thanks for the compliment, I appreciate it.

Guy
 
Top