Success, Colliers Mills, and the Long Road to 539

Ben Ruset

Administrator
Site Administrator
Oct 12, 2004
7,619
1,878
Monmouth County
www.benruset.com
I had been meaning to go back out to Colliers Mills for some time now. Having recently picked up some software that will let me calculate longitude and latitude on the historic maps (with some degree of innacuracy, though) I wanted to load the GPS up with some spots to look at and do some exploring.

First off, I wanted to find Success. Beck decided that it more or less didn't exist anymore. As much as I was hoping that he was wrong, I have a feeling that he was right on the money with this one. It turns out that Success was built around a sawmill, and that they were virtually guaranteed success by the large amounts of cedars nearby. Well, for one reason or another the mill failed, and the land was bought by Dr. Edward Smith. Smith tried various enterprises in the area, culminating with the digging of Success Lake by steamshovel and stocking it with carp.

From what I can tell, Success was located near where High Bridge Road comes out near Success Lake. Having only the old 1885 USGS Cassville map to go on, it appears that Success was located right around 40.058394N, 74.393054. This puts it on this little peninsula that juts out into Success Lake. Needless to say, there isn't anything there today. Another possibility is that the site of the sawmill was dug up when the lake was made, which I believe to be the most plausible theory.

Also on the map were two very odd sounding places. "Head of Snag" and "Head of Woods." If you do a Google search for Head of Snag you'll see someone's geanology page that mentions that someone was born there. The location today coincides with the location of the Halfway House bar on 539, just past the intersection of Colliers Mills Road. "Head of Woods" was named for the "Wood Swamp". Unfortunately the location of it is off in the woods on Fort Dix property. With no evidence of roads leading into the woods around the location, I think it's safe to say that there was never anything there.

Head of Snag:
40.051130N, 74.455643W

Head of Woods:
40..030063N, 74.459752

Without any luck finding those locations, I decided to drive down the road that leads past Colliers Mills WMA. It's a dirt road that leads down past the WMA and brings you right to where Lakehurst Air Station and Fort Dix meet. In fact, I'm not sure if the road is even legal to drive on. It appears that they are putting a fence right down the middle of the road in one part. There's nothing too interesting about the road, except that it drops you out to 539, and it's really bad sugar sand. I would NOT go down it unless you have 4WD and good tires.

Guy, I have a feeling that the road that I drove up is part of the Lawrence Line. I haven't checked, but it just reminded me of the part that we drove down the other day.
 

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
26,034
8,825
bruset said:
There's nothing too interesting about the road, except that it drops you out to 539, and it's really bad sugar sand. I would NOT go down it unless you have 4WD and good tires.

Guy, I have a feeling that the road that I drove up is part of the Lawrence Line. I haven't checked, but it just reminded me of the part that we drove down the other day.

I would NEVER bury my car on that road and have to be pushed out! Never! :wink:

Did you pass an AT&T Relay station on that road?

http://www.njpinebarrens.com/~teegate/ATTCableRelay.JPG

Guy
 

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
26,034
8,825
That was more than likely the road we were on. It comes out at 539.

Guy
 

Badfish740

Explorer
Feb 19, 2005
589
44
Copperhead Road
I know...I guess everyone else is out exploring while I'm stuck in a crappy apartment in North Jersey wishing I could get a weekend off and a 4x4 to get around in. On the bright side once I'm done I'll have all summer every summer to drive aimlessly through the sandroads (I'm going to teach high school history).

Later,

Matthew
 

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
26,034
8,825
You don't need a 4x4 to explore the pines. Just drive as far as you can with your car, and then walk.

Guy
 

Badfish740

Explorer
Feb 19, 2005
589
44
Copperhead Road
I guess I've had too many bad experiences with 2wd in the pines. Never in my own car but in others'. Once my friends and I attempted to explore with a Volvo wagon and it didn't go so well. We spent an awful lot of time searching for downed branches and jacking the car up out of ruts. Of course we probably should have used a little more restraint and not taken some of the roads we did.
 

Boyd

Administrator
Staff member
Site Administrator
Jul 31, 2004
9,914
3,061
Ben's Branch, Stephen Creek
I have to agree with Ben and Guy, you can get to many out of the way places in the pines without 4 wheel drive. Front wheel drive is good however. I have a VW Golf, and a couple Jettas before that.

Yeah, you do need some common sense as to what your vehicle is capable of however. When I started out I was very conservative about where I would go. Then as I gained experience I learned exactly what my car was capable of.

In about 12 years of exploring I've never gotten stuck anywhere in the pines (knocking wood as I write this! :)
 

wis bang

Explorer
Jun 24, 2004
235
2
East Windsor
I sold my Willys in 1977 [wish I had a barn to have 'hidden' it in!] and I tell all my college friends to think back. MOST of the 4 wheelin' we did during college was in two wheel drive.

4 X 4 means you pay 4 times a much for the vehicle, parts, aftermarket improvements, etc.

You get in trouble four times as quick & pay four times as much getting towed out four times as far...

We use 4X4 for hunting where we used to go, all in two trucks & all pile out of the closed truck to add traction weight to the tailgate of the open one...a 4X2 truck CAN be driven thru 15" of snow w/ eight guys standing in the bed over the back wheels... 4X4 made us lazy...
 
Top