Swamp Monster

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
26,003
8,769
A fun photo. Like an early PBX group! What was the Monster used for, do you happen to know?

Glo

If you do a search here you can find more, and maybe even the photo's of the harvest that I posted. But basically here is what I found:

The Swamp Monster was manufactured by the "Unit" Crane and Shovel
Corporation of Waukesha (Milwaukee) Wisconsin, with offices or
manufacturing plants in other cities. They produced several different
models with different attachments on each one. Some were shovels, some
were cranes, and there is an attachment with a magnet to move around
scrap metal. So which particular model is ours?

In order to find that out, I took a photo of the serial number on a
recent visit there, and started asking questions. Here is what I have found.

Up until 1946, Unit used a common number system for all of their
equipment, with the last piece made that year being serial number 2663.

In 1947 they started using the last two digits of the year of completion
as the serial number prefix, which then would be followed by the
quantity number of the piece made to date. Here is the serial number of
the Monster:


Link does not work anymore. Sorry.

http://www.njpinebarrens.com/teegate...rialNumber.JPG

So given that number is 51802, we now know that it was produced in 1951.
I also learned that more than likely, it was built in November or
December of that year because the 802 is slightly less than the machines
built that year. I have not found out how many were actually built that
year.

I also learned that the two model numbers were the 514 and the 614, but
I have not learned as of yet how that is determined. But from the
photo's I have of it there is a clear consensus that it is a 614 which
has a capacity of 5/8 of a yard. I would then assume that the 514 was
the smaller one, with a capacity of 1/2 yards, and the size determines
the model.

Most of these units had the cab set a few feet above the deck gear hood
which made for good visibility.

Guy
 

ecampbell

Piney
Jan 2, 2003
2,894
1,037
Ed told me it was used to harvest White Cedar.

Jim

No I didn't. You asked me what the trees were and I said white cedar. I don't know what they were doing with the crane.
But on second thought maybe they were trying to control the water. It sure is wet out there but I saw no trenches at the Monster site.
 

ecampbell

Piney
Jan 2, 2003
2,894
1,037
My mistake Ed, i read your statement the wrong way.

Jim

No big deal but it got me thinking, so I went to the historical aerials site to compair old photos and found no significant difference in forestation. So I guess not logging.

Too bad we can't convey the adventure of getting to a place like that. Puddle after puddle, with rutted bottoms but who knows where. Water over my bumpers and bottom of the doors. Hiking the last .7 mile without filling up your knee highs.

A good day!

Ed :)
 
Oct 25, 2006
1,757
1
74
Yes Ed it was a very good day with many different scenarios, the puddles had my adrenaline up, now i just have to get me those tow hooks, thanks for taking George and me there.

Jim
 

glowordz

Explorer
Jan 19, 2009
585
8
SC
www.gloriarepp.com
No I didn't. You asked me what the trees were and I said white cedar. I don't know what they were doing with the crane.
But on second thought maybe they were trying to control the water. It sure is wet out there but I saw no trenches at the Monster site.

Okay, that answers the question I was going to send you, Ed. :)

Glo
 

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
26,003
8,769
I will scan up the article on the logging that went on there. It was used for logging.

Guy
 
Oct 25, 2006
1,757
1
74
Pure Jersey white cedar. The finest in all the land.

Back in the late 80's and 90's i went Canyon Fishing for Tuna in my former Marina owner's 23 foot Formula, Cedar Plugs were the lure of choice when trolling, they out performed every other artificial without a doubt.

Jim
 

manumuskin

Piney
Jul 20, 2003
8,683
2,608
60
millville nj
www.youtube.com
Not so on the pyxie moss Al. If you saw that after backing up a bit you'd recognize it as sand myrtle...Leiophyllum buxifolium. An easy mistake looking straight down on it. Pyxie is only an inch or so high.

you got me Bob:) I will not argue plants with the master.Now if you get me on a snake your really doin something:)
Al
 
Top