Here we go again. We need to push back on any road closure. https://www.nj.gov/dep/parksandfore...E2bJxJQRqZzDAIN8vErJtzBiAjIwrqDd4r0PJ_pH16zF4
In addition to the in-person open house, those interested in reviewing and commenting on the Wharton Visitor Vehicle Use Map and associated materials will also be able to view and submit comments online. An online public comment period will be available for 45 days, from Jan. 24 until Mar. 9, for those who are unable to attend in person.
My point being that confusion will reign if you don't know where you came from and where you are going with the new plan.
Get off your high horse feller. Are you going? Will you be behind a desk explaining?By all means, be sure to go, especially if your message is that *your* convenience and *your* personal recreational preferences are more important to you than conservation.
Russell, I thought your position was more nuanced than this.By all means, be sure to go, especially if your message is that *your* convenience and *your* personal recreational preferences are more important to you than conservation.
The word conservation is used improperly in the context of your statement. I believe you would be much happier if this Map is strong on preservation.By all means, be sure to go, especially if your message is that *your* convenience and *your* personal recreational preferences are more important to you than conservation.
The nuance is right there in the conditional clause: "especially if your message is that *your* convenience and *your* personal recreational preferences are more important to you than conservation." I especially want people for whom that is true to go and express themselves. The real lack of nuance is expressed by those who don't want to acknowledge the ecological impacts of motorized recreation and just keep saying, "No road closures." A motorized access plan of any kind within a globally-important ecosystem is necessarily a compromise between protection of the ecosystem and convenience to visitors. The ideal state for the ecosystem would be zero motorized traffic. The ideal state for the visitors would be unrestrained access. This has all been articulated over and over again and repeated on the DEP site: https://www.nj.gov/dep/parksandforests/wharton/. "Data to create the Visitor Vehicle Use Map was gathered through an extensive stakeholdering process, during which more than 1,600 people submitted surveys, noting areas of interest and routes that were important to them. Additionally, DEP data on endangered, threatened and of conservation concern plant and animal species; wetlands; historic and cultural resources; and Natural Areas and Natural Heritage Priority Sites were taken into consideration during the Visitor Vehicle Use Map’s development."Russell, I thought your position was more nuanced than this.
I like doing word analysis, and I think you have a legitimate point in the distinction between conservation and preservation. The meanings of the two words, though, don't seem to me to be so cut and dried. One example would be the case of coastal plain intermittent ponds in the NJ pine barrens. I think they should be "preserved," in the sense that I don't want them to be lost or destroyed, but I certainly wouldn't want them to be "preserved" in the sense of being entirely removed from human use. The only issue is whether the use by humans is degrading them. And I think that holds for the pine barrens in general. The meaning of most any word varies with the context and the intent of the user. Pinelands Preservation Alliance wants the pine barrens preserved in the sense that its mission is to try to keep it from being lost or destroyed or damaged. The name certainly wasn't chosen to imply that it thinks the pine barrens should be removed entirely from human use. To understand that, you only have to look at the fact that PPA actively encourages outings in the pine barrens, including those that involve motorized travel.The word conservation is used improperly in the context of your statement. I believe you would be much happier if this Map is strong on preservation.
From a National Park Service lesson plan entitled, Conservation vs Preservation and the National Park Service:
"Put simply conservation seeks the proper use of nature, while preservation seeks protection of nature from use."
Is it coincidence that the PPA stands for Pinelands Preservation Alliance ? I think not.
This has all been articulated over and over again...