Bass River Fire Tower proposal

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by lj762, Jan 24, 2018.

  1. ecampbell

    ecampbell Piney

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    2,489
    Likes Received:
    549
    Wow, invoking rust belt Pennsylvania, the paragon of 19th century thinking. Remote imaging has already happened and it is more than just looking for smoke. I hope that some educated people are involved in this decision before the citizens of New Jersey are locked into this ridiculous decision into the 22nd century.
     
    Boyd likes this.
  2. Boyd

    Boyd Super Moderator
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    6,726
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Found this 2014 article with a quick search, I'm sure there are many others....

    http://www.oregonlive.com/today/index.ssf/2014/09/northwest_wildfires_cameras_in.html
    _______

    "Many states no longer have any staffed forest fire lookouts, according to the lookout association. Florida has the most — 130 — with Oregon in second place. Washington has 107 lookouts standing, but only 30 are staffed. California has 198 standing but only 50 are staffed, according to the association."
     
  3. bobpbx

    bobpbx Piney
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2002
    Messages:
    11,150
    Likes Received:
    1,888
    After reading all the pros and cons here, I vote to not cut the trees, and to instead use the current tower as the platform to erect the first camera for feasibility testing.
     
  4. 46er

    46er Piney

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2004
    Messages:
    8,257
    Likes Received:
    1,813
    h2ochild likes this.
  5. c1nj

    c1nj Explorer

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    Messages:
    109
    Likes Received:
    26
    As far as remote sensing via satellite is concerned. The present satellite travels overhead approximately 4 times a day. That may work in Alaska but not in NJ.
     
    smoke_jumper likes this.
  6. 46er

    46er Piney

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2004
    Messages:
    8,257
    Likes Received:
    1,813
    They are also adversely affected by the size, weather and cloud cover. But just like most everyone on this site, no direct knowledge of the systems or wildfire detection/suppression. I'll leave the decisions to those that do. But it is interesting to read the varied opinions.
     
    #66 46er, May 3, 2018
    Last edited: May 3, 2018
  7. Boyd

    Boyd Super Moderator
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    6,726
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    I know nothing about systems of wildfire detection/suppression. But a quick Google search will find a number of articles similar to the one I posted, where states are replacing staffed towers with technology. These are reports about what has already been done elsewhere and not "opinions". But I realize how ignorant someone in Oregon might be about conditions that are specific to New Jersey. I mean... they probably even let people pump gasoline into their own cars in Oregon! :ninja:

    Also interesting that, according to the article, California - a state of about 164,000 square miles - has 50 staffed fire towers. Yet we have 21 staffed towers to cover New Jersey's vast 7,400 square miles. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_New_Jersey_Forest_Fire_Service_fire_towers

    My house is out in the woods bordering on thousands of acres of WMA, so I truly appreciate the work that the Fire Service does to protect me from fire. And if a guy in a tower is the best way to do that and some trees need to be cut down, then so be it. But there seem to be plenty of examples where other states are switching to more modern systems. I just hope someone is studying the feasibility of these systems and the advantages they might have. I also hope this isn't just an attempt to preserve a few unneccesary state jobs. People would still be needed to watch the video and maintain the system.

    (edited to correct error in state sizes)
     
    #67 Boyd, May 3, 2018
    Last edited: May 3, 2018
    mowergod likes this.
  8. bobpbx

    bobpbx Piney
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2002
    Messages:
    11,150
    Likes Received:
    1,888
    In fact, that might even be a welcome step up for the employees in this situation. See and do something new. Be the vanguard test-bed for the state. And, if they decide it's not working out, then....
     
  9. 46er

    46er Piney

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2004
    Messages:
    8,257
    Likes Received:
    1,813
    This thread got me curious up, so have been searching. This is how the satellite detection stuff works, still need humans :D

    The products used by NOAA

    http://www.ospo.noaa.gov/Products/land/fire.html

    The Hazard Mapping System
    Product shows the detected hot spots and smoke plumes indicating possible fire locations. This is a blended product using algorithms for the GOES Imager, the POES AVHRR and MODIS. A quality control procedure is performed by an analyst on the automated fire detections. Significant smoke plumes that are detected by the satellites are outlined by the analyst as well with an estimate of the smoke concentration provided. This product is created and updated as needed between 1 PM and 11 PM Eastern time. After 11 PM the analysis is fine-tuned as time permits. The graphical HMS product is finalized once daily.

    http://www.ospo.noaa.gov/Products/land/hms.html

    One of the algorithms used.

    http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/FIRE/Layers/ABBA/abba.html

    Amazing that a guy or gal in a tower gets the same thing done, and probably quicker. ;)
     
  10. Toothy Critter

    Toothy Critter Explorer

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2016
    Messages:
    317
    Likes Received:
    209


    I highly doubt that 80 years ago, CCC planted these trees with the sole intention of them being cut down by a private lumberjack with no financial gain due. The window of opportunity to harvest the trees for $ has unfortunately passed. But to argue that this situation was the original intent is false and only now becomes a convenient argument for proponents of the tree cutting.

    As far as the grove not being native to the Pines, is a cop out. Were coyotes populous here in the past? Or, were in fact all the people who live here now, who in fact the fire towers are meant to protect, so abundant as in the past. Almost all of the homes in the Pines are non-native. Would you suggest that they be sacrificed in order to save some money? Because lets face it, the control of fire is not needed to protect the forest, nature does a good job of taking care of her own.

    But finally. You know, I have the same access to books, web site, articles, etc. that you have my friend. So to "assume" that a persons view is misinformed, or noise, because it is in opposition to yours, is insulting. So then, in the future, if you post any comments that I find not in my liking, can I then label them as "uneducated dribble?" Or maybe the term "ignorant banter." Or perhaps just....."plain ********"
    No, I can't see how that would be helpful.
     
    1Jerseydevil likes this.
  11. Toothy Critter

    Toothy Critter Explorer

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2016
    Messages:
    317
    Likes Received:
    209

    Sorry for the delay in this post I was away for the week:
    I am truly sorry if I bring any hardship to this site with the expression of my personal opinions. I should remember the policy of this site, and respect those wishes, which in fact I did not do, and for this I am sorry. I imposed my own beliefs on this site and was wrong for doing so. I shall remember this as a lesson learned. Again....my apologies.
     
    #71 Toothy Critter, May 5, 2018
    Last edited: May 5, 2018
    Boyd likes this.
  12. Toothy Critter

    Toothy Critter Explorer

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2016
    Messages:
    317
    Likes Received:
    209
    Although there are a couple of issues that I do in fact need to be informed on without going back on 4 pages of posts to see if it has been addressed. Who in fact would be responsible for paying for the construction of a new tower? And,,, as far as I know (which is not much) are not the groves in question located in the National Reserve? Wouldn't the Federal Government in fact be the ones to foot the bill,,, or at least be willing to help subsidize?
     
  13. Toothy Critter

    Toothy Critter Explorer

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2016
    Messages:
    317
    Likes Received:
    209

    Property stones are not "native" but yes indeed, are historical... so why not apply the same logic to the trees? I find the fact that these groves were planted by CCC workers, at such a time in America, to be historical too. ;)

    But now please allow me to shut up and prepare for this coming weeks fish/camp trip. Is a great time of the year to be a retired old grumpy fart
     
    Teegate and bobpbx like this.
  14. 46er

    46er Piney

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2004
    Messages:
    8,257
    Likes Received:
    1,813
    The NJ FFS, i.e. the state.

    Nope and nope. The feds do not own the land of the preserve, NJ does. Someone might be able to apply for a grant if it fits into a category, but I doubt it.

    https://www.usfa.fema.gov/grants/
     
  15. 1Jerseydevil

    1Jerseydevil Explorer

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2009
    Messages:
    340
    Likes Received:
    86
    Oh boy. I enjoy the woods as we all do. I've been in the grove of white pines and really like the change from the "pine barrens". No I do not spend a lot of time in the white pines, hardly at all. No matter the fact they may have been planted with the intention to harvest, times have changed. Since these small groves are a mere "island" in the barrens, recreational enjoyment has a value, no? The white pines are not harmful to the surrounding area and in fact must now have it's own ecosystem. These pines are renewable but not again in our lifetime. Let them be and treasure what they are. Technology is and will replace the manned towers and the trees will be gone when that happens. Either replace the tower with a higher one or use cameras. The State of course claims "no money" for this but can certainly find $$ for other frivolous projects can't it? Money can be found, believe it. Yes it's nice a lumber company will do the job for free and maybe even throw a couple hundred dollars in the pot. If say 10 acres of pine barren forest was to be cleared I for one would not object as there are thousands of surrounding same to take it's place.
    Seems like everywhere we go nowadays we're surrounded by endangered species this, endangered species that. What about the human endangered species "forest recreationalist"?
     
    Toothy Critter likes this.
  16. lj762

    lj762 Explorer

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2017
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    127
    White Pines, taken this morning on the CCC (Orange) Trail at Bass River State Forest. Although this isn't far from the tower, these trees are NOT in one of the areas of the map to be cut. These will still be around for all to enjoy. Although you may notice that 4 or 5 in the middle are now just bare trunks - no branches or needles. I suppose that means they are dead. bassriver_white_pines.jpg
     
    Teegate likes this.
  17. lj762

    lj762 Explorer

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2017
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    127
  18. lj762

    lj762 Explorer

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2017
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    127
    Update: The Pinelands Commission vote was delayed. From The SandPaper, July 18th: "Pinelands Commission Delays Action on Clear Cutting Forest Around Fire Tower". There was an appeal by a Bass River Twp resident, and because of the gas pipeline litigation, the commission now sends all appeals to the state AG office which didn't get to it in time for the July 13th meeting.

    The article also has interesting information that was apparently never released before, including about a similar Forest Fire Service proposal in 1995.

    https://thesandpaper.villagesoup.co...lear-cutting-forest-around-fire-tower/1764316
     
    h2ochild and Toothy Critter like this.
  19. Cherokee261

    Cherokee261 Scout

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2015
    Messages:
    65
    Likes Received:
    69
  20. lj762

    lj762 Explorer

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2017
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    127
    Wow. That is quite a surprise to me. I knew the vote was Friday, but looking at the materials for the meeting it looked like it was a done deal and just waiting for them to sign it.

    Question: The article you linked to said the next step is to go before a judge, "creating the possibility of a prolonged legal fight between the two environmental agencies." What are the two agencies? DEP and Pinelands Commission? Or Forest Fire Service and someone else?