He played this tragedy as if it were some sort of canary in our civil coalmine. It's outrageous, insulting, and deserving of nothing but scorn.
He played this tragedy? How so-what exactly did he do so worthy of your scorn?
He played this tragedy as if it were some sort of canary in our civil coalmine. It's outrageous, insulting, and deserving of nothing but scorn.
This extremely chilling video that Loughner made freaks me out so very much. Can you people of NJPB guess why? It's kind of familiar, actually.
Bobpbx said:He played this tragedy? How so-what exactly did he do so worthy of your scorn?
Being angry and weird.Heh, I thought the same thing when I saw it. Really the only similarity is guy, walking around with camera, being weird. But maybe that was enough similarity.
IHe advanced the idea that the shooting in Tuscon "said something" about America.
See second paragraph, above. That was the part that the media picked up, and if you can give me a valid reason why it was included, then I will reconsider my stance. Nothing in a presidential speech is there by chance. You tell me what Loughner's actions had to do with our supposedly sharply polarized discourse? Let me boil the first two paragraphs down for you: 1) of course we can't know why such a thing happened; but 2) about those teabaggers.
Alright dude, well, I think we just need to leave it then. You ain't changing my mind, and I'm not changing yours. You can have the last word. For my part it's much more of a stretch to suggest that Obama was addressing the post-trauma political atmosphere. There would be no reason to do so, and nothing like that has been said, to my remembrance, after any other such tragedy. The remarks were made in a context and he would not have wanted to be so easily misunderstood, if in fact he was not saying what he seemed to be saying.You are really reaching here Mark...picking it apart and trying to see the bad in Obama between the lines. Why can't you also, conversely, consider that he was talking about the discourse 'after' the shooting-and trying to cool it down some as well as make a point that it is only making a tragedy worse. Think about this...could he also have been telling the Tuscon Police Chief that he was making a too-hasty decision to blame the radio pundits? I don't see where you get teabaggers our of that paragraph at all. Even conservative talk-show hosts had a hard time dragging this one through the mud.
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politi...ma-for-Tucson-speech.-Can-partisan-pause-last
You can have the last word. For my part it's much more of a stretch to suggest that Obama was addressing the post-trauma political atmosphere. There would be no reason to do so, and nothing like that has been said, to my remembrance, after any other such tragedy. The remarks were made in a context and he would not have wanted to be so easily misunderstood, if in fact he was not saying what he seemed to be saying.