Hi all,
Its been a busy summer, so I haven’t been able to respond to comments. It is possible that these tessellations have little to do with a development, but have been part of some scientific endeavor. One candidate is a silvicultural experiment, although it’s only a guess. Various forest test plots have been laid out over the years. Whether or not these lines are related to forestry, there is a little-known Pine Barrens story to be told about the subject.
During the 1950s and ‘60s there was a quiet plan to burn off oaks to encourage pitch-pine growth. Although foresters like Elbert Little and Silas Little claimed studies were to intended develop better timber resources, the actual purpose I am told was to manipulate Pine Barrens groundwater resources for the hydrologists. Their true goal was to increase groundwater recharge. It was thought that pines were thriftier consumers of water resources than broadleafed trees, although ironically new studies seem to indicate the opposite is true. Pines may be thirstier than oaks after all! Planners were already anticipating the day when the public would tap Pinelands groundwater resources to support urbanization outside the Pine region.
Now everyone simply puts straws along the Reserve’s perimeter and sucks hard, draining its lifeblood from the margins. This reminds me of the 2007 movie There Will Be Blood, wherein a crafty oil baron simply extracts neighboring parcels of their oil negating any need to buy adjacent property rights. According to an NJDEP study, “A comparison of the water supply and existing water demand estimates indicates that both the Great Egg Harbor River and Mullica River watersheds are already overdrawn” (2003: Status of the Water Supply of Southeastern New Jersey: Executive Summary, draft, September 2003. Land Use Management, Division of Watershed Management, Trenton, NJ. 18 pp.).
S-M