Fair enough but I was more interested in non enduro racing dual sport activities in the Pines and whether it was/is legal to drive off road on single track and firecuts. The enduro racing folks seem to have their stuff together and run a tight ship but independent riders outside of events...what is their legal status off road(s)?There is much more to worry about out there than enduro races. We need to worry about people who think we will forget.
Fair enough but I was more interested in non enduro racing dual sport activities in the Pines and whether it was/is legal to drive off road on single track and firecuts. The enduro racing folks seem to have their stuff together and run a tight ship but independent riders outside of events...what is their legal status off road(s)?
Outside of the enduro races........I always thought that dual sport bikes were legally allowed at anytime on single track and firecuts....is that correct? Or has the use of single track and firecuts been allowed but not necessarily legal? Anyone know for certain? Reading the State Forest regs it is unclear. It would appear that dual sport bikes are allowed on sand roads and trails (like any other licensed, insured, registered vehicle) but not off road (including single track and firecuts). Thoughts?
I believe riding in fire cuts was not permitted but it's be impossible to enforce. It's also important to note most plowlines go through upland pines and are only used for control burns. Lowlands and swamps rarely have plow lines if at all.
Bob I agree some do go through small patches of lowlands. It's impossible to completely avoid them. I can think of a couple around me but there aren't that many. I just wanted to point out that by design they usually avoid lowlands. I might add that ones that weren't planned out and made during a fire usually are the ones that violate the wetlands the most. Any time a plow goes through the pines highland or low land it is disturbing nature or possibly even history.
I don't have a problem with Enduros at all. They are part of the Pine Barren tradition. But with that said, it would be great if:
--They were planned to avoid sensitive areas.
--They were all mapped.
--After a certain amount (like a quantity of 30-40 throughout the designated Pinelands), no more could be constructed. Use the old ones, and let them lie fallow for a few years between events.
I remember an instance back in the '90's when the FFS asked me to ride my motorcycle in the firebreaks to help keep them clear. I would really like to hear a good argument as to why motorcycles should not be allowed in the cuts. I know there is a concern for wild life that might be utilizing the cut (snakes especially) but I had never come close to hitting one in a fire cut, or had seen a dead one in a cut. Same goes for turtles. I know there was a recent incident where a snake was killed in a cut but I suspect that this sort of thing was a freak accident and not common place, or even occasional.
Minimizing risk to wildlife is an important concern, but a maintained (clear) cut might be more advantageous to preserving wildlife in the event of a fire than the rare fatality as a result of a motorcycle. Specifically for turtles which have the hardest time in a fire.
Now, if the argument is that motorcycles are not a natural risk to fauna, and fire is, you have to consider the origin of the fire...human carelessness is not a natural occurrence either if that is the cause of the fire. I think that argument is a dead end anyway when you consider fire suppression etc .
I think it would be interesting to conduct a study of fauna fatality risk in the firebreaks.
Jeff
Very well said. I couldn't agree more.If by firebreaks, which could mean almost any path or road in the roods, you are referring to what are more commonly called plow lines by the FFS, riding bikes on them would do virtually nothing as far as the the needs of the FFS go. They are not intended to wildfire breaks and are far too narrow to have that effect. They are starting lines for prescribed burns and are re-plowed each and every time the tract is burned. In order to keep the torched line of fire from crossing the plow line, burning with the wind and potentially moving up into the canopy and escaping control, there has to be virtually no twigs, leaves or needles in the line, hence the need to plow it prior to the burn. Motorcycles would be useless in that role. I'm not addressing any negative effects blamed on bikes or quads but this defense is a bit of a reach. I think allowing vehicles (not mudders) on historic woods roads for that reason is more defensible on the other hand. These roads can and will grow in over time without vehicles using them and the FFS has a stake in keeping them open as well as the rest of us.
If by firebreaks, which could mean almost any path or road in the woods, you are referring to what are more commonly called plow lines by the FFS, riding bikes on them would do virtually nothing as far as the the needs of the FFS go. They are not intended to be wildfire breaks and are far too narrow to have that effect. They are starting lines for prescribed burns and are re-plowed each and every time the tract is burned. In order to keep the torched line of fire from crossing the plow line, burning with the wind and potentially moving up into the canopy and escaping control, there has to be virtually no twigs, leaves or needles in the line, hence the need to plow it prior to the burn. Motorcycles would be useless in that role. I'm not addressing any negative effects blamed on bikes or quads but this defense is a bit of a reach. I think allowing vehicles (not mudders) on historic woods roads for that reason is more defensible on the other hand. These roads can and will grow in over time without vehicles using them and the FFS has a stake in keeping them open as well as the rest of us.