All,
Over the years I have acquired quite a few deeds, and with many of them I really have no idea where to begin. One in particular has frustrated me every time I look at it. I have even mentioned to Rooftree about a stone being along the west side of the Sykes and to keep an eye out for it since he was spending quite a bit of time there after and before the fire. While working on last weeks search of the Cedar Bridge Hills development along 72, I happened to look over tax records of the area and one particular records solved the riddle for me. I brought up the old deed and using my Google Earth records I started comparing distances of the area with what the deed was telling me. Bingo! Some of them matched. So it was time to solve the riddle that has eluded me for years.
The deed says:
Beginning at a large stone on the west edge of the Little Sykes Branch, being also the beginning corner of Anthony Sykes "Mine Survey" made A.D. 1762 for 650 acres, of which this tract is a part, and the same point being the beginning corner of William Griffith's survey of 4085 acres A.D. 1819; also the beginning corner of Thomas Newbold's 73.34 acres, A.D. 1819.
Those who know the Sykes Branch, and were reading this as I was, would head along the western side of the Sykes and look for the stone. However, there is a second Sykes Branch not even close to the main one that I never even realized. Armed with this information I have spent quite a few hours here and have finally broke this deed.
So this morning Jessica and I went looking for the stone mentioned above. With almost a mile walk we reached the Little Sykes and started traveling the western edge as the deed mentions. I had three possible locations to look, and decided to go to the furthest one. It was quite dense and the question was how close to the edge was it? Jessica was behind me and decided to step off the upland and travel the moist edge. She made the correct decision and seconds later I was alerted that she had found it.
When the stone was placed there I am uncertain of, but as mentioned above someone was at this spot almost two decades before the Constitution.
View attachment 14439
View attachment 14440
We searched for another one but it is so dense that we most likely will never find it. Maybe if we got there right after the fire we might have a chance, but this area was only slightly burned and is still dense. There is another one we will be heading to very soon that is near the sand plant on 539.