I miss the days when property lines were marked by stones, white oaks, and double-trunked pines! Those delineations were unambiguous, even tactile. I understand why this group loves old survey stones. You knew just where your land began and ended by sight alone. Now we have to put trust into engineers and surveyors, and hope our land-use officials have the ability to assist when a measurement is questioned.
The Pinelands Commission insisted that the obviously flawed survey was correct as an engineer had certified it so, this despite the many pages of documentation that were provided to the contrary. When I sought due process to correct the Pinelands misinterpretation, their solicitor denied my request to have the matter reviewed at the Office of Administrative Law. Their council determined trespass of railroad development onto my land did “not raise a particularized property interest sufficient to require a hearing on constitutional grounds” (letter dated April 27, 2015, Roth to Demitroff).
More bad precedent was set. Nearly all of the land slated for Block 700 development adjoining my property was located in land designated as Forest Area. The Pinelands Commission approved redevelopment outside the Pinelands-approved redevelopment zone. Redevelopment is not a permitted use in Forest zoning under Pinelands rules or under State Redevelopment statute. Taking and forcing an illegal land use onto my property undermines basic property rights that go all the way back to King John and the Magna Carta.
S-M