I find it a little ironic theres an album on there with a Pine Barrens cleanup on it as well. They may just not realize the damage they're doing, environmentally or historically. I spotted Jemima mount on there too.
You can actually see the damage form the aerial.
Jeff
If you go to the photos for 4/26/09 on the 8th set of pictures are some of geodetic markers.
Its a growing motorsport and I see no stopping it.
I agree to an extent. I do believe that not many people understand the history within the Pines. I know I didn't until I started coming on here. But at the same time I don't know how the state could be blamed either. The only way I could see the state helping a small area like that is to put chain and posts around it along with a sign that gave a historical briefing. Other than that, I don't know what more the state could do. Or,,,,,,,,,,,, maybe it is time we approach the state and ask if we can put something similar to mentioned up. People can sit here and cry and whine every weekend this happens, they can call the state and get blown off. I guess no one has enough concern to do anything other than that though. I myself will throw $50 in the pot towards preserving this spot. I'll get the materials and help set them up. Tired of being called a "neanderthal testosterone freaks" by a certain someone who needs to get their facts straight before singling out a whole crowd. And if it means so much why don't people stand up and do it themselves. I mean get real, we live in Jersey how much assistance to you really expect to get?
I don't think raw materials (fence, guardrail) will do the job. It means nothing to people. But I do think a nicely worded sign will. Wasn't there a sign there at one time? How about one of those signs cast in bronze that we see along roadways, like they use for the tavern site at Sooy. It can have a footnote..."Please keep vehicles off".
I don't think the people who commit the acts we're discussing need my help to appear ignorant, and I think I've been clear enough all along that I am discussing those people, and not everyone who drives a truck. Although I will admit I am skeptical of anyone for whom the truck is the hobby, as opposed to the places the truck can go. If the truck is the hobby, then it almost certainly means that enjoying the hobby means driving it over stuff that wasn't meant to be driven on, and that is almost always necessarily destructive. If it's done in a park, as you would prefer, then fine and dandy, except that I remain convinced that not one "mudder" in ten would confine his or her activities to a regulated 4WD park.
In any event, you're quite right about the definitional issues involved with having laws about where you can and can't drive. I believe the current, and almost unenforcable, law is fairly clear: if the road isn't on a topo you shouldn't be driving on it.
stay on the damn roads, and don't tear them up. Kind of leaves the joy out of it for "mudder" types, I guess, .
Not at all. It could always be excavated later by professionals if that was deemed worthwhile. There is a lot of precedent for covering over historic sites to protect them from neanderthal testosterone freaks and relic hunters. Martha Furnace is one example. I would much rather that nothing have to change, but if the only answer to these dumbass wheelers is guard rails in the woods I'd rather they just fill the damn thing in.