Mary Ann Forge

Mary Ann Forge

The Mary Ann Forge has always been somewhat enigmatic for those who enjoy poking around the more obscure locations in the Pine Barrens. While many of you have read what Charles Boyer wrote about this location, for those who have not, I quote what he wrote about Mary Ann from his 1931 book, New Jersey Forges and Furnaces:

MARY ANN FORGE, Burlington County. It has been stated by several writers that this was furnace and was built in the early 1790s but there does not seem to be any foundation for either of these statements. It is not shown on any of the early maps examined nor is it mentioned in T.F. Gordon’s Gazetteer of New Jersey. The first map on which Mary Ann Forge appears is the Finley Map of 1831. The land on which this forge stood was long known as the Mary Ann Tract, on which there were several sawmills. On a map made in 1861, it is marked “Marian Forge.”
Benjamin Jones purchased this tract from John Black in May 1827, and a few years later built the Mary Ann Fore on Mount Misery Run about three miles southeast of New Lisbon. Its two hammers were supplied with pig iron from the Hanover Furnace. When Samuel H. Jones and Richard Jones purchased the holdings of their father, Benjamin, in 1846, this tract was included in the sale. Its subsequent history is closely interwoven with the many financial difficulties of the Jones brothers. In 1851, Samuel H. Jones gave a mortgage to Anthony S. Morris, trustee, for one-half of the Hanover Furnace Tract, Mount Misery Tract, Mary Ann Forge Tract, and several other tracts, which is the first recorded notice of the forge that has been located. The forge itself continued to be operated until late in the Civil War, and on a map made in 1877 is marked “not now in use,” and today the only trace of the old plant is a pile of forge cinders, the dam and sheeting.
The principal products of the forge were first bar iron. In later years, wagon axles and wagon tires were made on an extensive scale.


It appears Boyer conducted his research with due diligence, consulting both the deeds and the mortgages recorded in the Burlington County Clerk’s Office. Yet there are small errors in his account of Mary Ann. For example, the 1831 Finley map that Boyer cites fails to depict Mary Ann’s location and does not include a label for the place name:



Even the 1834 edition of Finley’s map, included as the tipped-in, folded plate with Thomas F. Gordon’s A Gazetteer of the State of New Jersey… fails to identify Mary Ann Forge. It is actually the 1836 Tanner map that shows “Maryann” [sic] with three small black squares to indicate a small settlement or hamlet:



In checking earlier maps, like William Watson’s from 1812, there is no sign of any furnace or forge where Mary Ann stood later in the nineteenth century:

Detail_New_Jersey_Watson_1812_copy.jpg


The first map that I have found that depicts Mary Ann is actually the revised edition of Thomas Gordon’s A Map of the State of New Jersey with Part of the Adjoining States, published in 1833. And based on the symbols employed on the Gordon map, this cartographer properly identified Mary Ann as a forge and not as a furnace:

Detail_New_Jersey_Gordon_1833_copy.jpg


While Boyer properly notes that the Gordon Gazetteer did not include a separate listing for “Mary Ann” in its descriptions of localities, he did fail to record the presence of “two forges” within the description of Northampton Township, which at that time included present-day Pemberton Township. Ten years after Gordon published his gazetteer, John W. Barber and Henry Howe produced Historical Collections of the State of New Jersey and this work does enumerate “Mary Ann” among the localities within Northampton Township. The 1849 Map of Burlington County by A.W. Otley and E. Whiteford, provides us with the most detailed view of Mary Ann Forge and its small village of worker housing:

Mary_Ann_Furnace.jpg


Note that Richard Jones maintained a residence at Mary Ann Forge, located near the forge’s furnace. The 1858 map of Burlington County by William Parry, George Sykes and F.W. Earl, has a rudimentary view of Mary Ann and lacks much of the detail the 1849 map provides:

Detail_1858_Map.jpg


Although the Jones family continued to operate Hanover Furnace until 1864, they also established a new ironworks at Florence, on the Delaware River during 1857-1858. Most sources indicate Mary Ann ceased processing Hanover iron sometime in the early 1860s. At some point, forging operations likely shifted to the Florence facility and Mary Ann became superfluous. The 1861 division of the vast Jones family land holdings left Richard Jones with the lower half of the property the “Marian Forge” and 25,145 acres. A member of these forums is a descendent of the Jones family and possesses an original edition of the published map that depicted the Jones’s expansive landholdings within the Pines.

Boyer mentions an 1877 map that shows Mary Ann Furnace as “not in use.” This is actually the Pemberton Township plate in the 1876 Scott atlas of Burlington County:

Detail_1876_Scott_Atlas.jpg


In Volume III of the Final Report of the State Geologist, C.C. Vermeule reported,

Mount Misery brook, at New Lisbon, will give for 9 months 5.6 horse-power per foot fall, and about 9 feet fall could be developed, or 15 feet by eliminating the power at Lower Mill. At the site of the old Mary Ann furnace there is 8 feet fall not at present in use. The water-shed is 38 square miles, and the available power 2.85 horse-power per foot fall. Just above this, at Mount Misery, a saw-mill was erected as early as 1723. Indeed, many of the sites on the Rancocas date back to about the beginning of the 18th century, and one as early as 1680. An important power was built at Pemberton in 1752 to operate a forge, saw and grist-mill.

At the Pemberton Railroad Station Museum, I purchased a booklet called Runaway by John C. Borton. The work provides “An account of a family log cabin on the upper reaches of the Rancocas Creek in New Lisbon, N.J. from 1916 to 1976.” While some of the information imparted concerning Mary Ann Forge is incorrect, it is still interesting to read an early twentieth-century account of visiting the abandoned site:

Mary Ann Furnace was a favorite trip. It was about 5 hours up stream from Runaway by canoe and three hours back. By foot it was about two hours each way. It was constructed in 1793 and produced iron from bog ore. An artificial lake provided power to work the furnace bellows and operate hammers to pound the molten iron to remove impurities. I have not found any record of how long the furnace operated, but it probably closed down in the 1840s when the iron ore and coal in Pennsylvania put the inefficient bog ore furnaces out of existence. When we first visited the site, all traces of the furnaces had disappeared, but most of the dam was still in place. A few lumps of slag were the only evidence of the once prosperous furnace. Near by was delightful pine grove where we had many happy picnics. Swimming in the stream above the broken dam was always refreshing.

The booklet includes several photographs of the ruins at Mary Ann when these explorers visited the site during the 1920s and 1930s.

At some point in time following the cessation of ironworking, the area around Mary Ann Forge became dedicated to cranberry production.

Feel free to add any information to this thread that I may have overlooked.

Best regards,
Jerseyman
 

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
26,003
8,769
A member of these forums is a descendent of the Jones family and possesses an original edition of the published map that depicted the Jones’s expansive landholdings within the Pines.

Jerseyman,

A very nice addition! Thanks!

I could add the stones I tracked down but I don't want to add all that to your nice report. However, you did mention this. It was scanned from the original and I had to use a stitching program which did not align it perfectly. It sure helped me in my searching.

FullJonesTract.jpg


Guy
 

bobpbx

Piney
Staff member
Oct 25, 2002
14,715
4,898
Pines; Bamber area
Thanks Jerseyman. That forge is dear to my heart as I lived in Presidential Lakes from 1966 to 1978 and I visited the forge often in my youth. I always wondered about the canal, and now I see it was for a sawmill. The forge has always been difficult to explore on the south side due to heavy briar, but we have found at least one foundation. This makes another visit worthwhile.
 

MarkBNJ

Piney
Jun 17, 2007
1,875
73
Long Valley, NJ
www.markbetz.net
Ben:

From my recollection, the briers are so bad out there that even the British Army would not have gotten through:


:D

Best regards,
Jerseyman

Great report on Mary Ann Forge, Jerseyman. Seeing the maps together like that really helps round out the story, and then the link to Johnny Horton's Battle of New Orleans made my afternoon :). I had the original LP including that tune in 1966 or so, and played the heck out of it. One of my sisters eventually broke it in half.
 

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
26,003
8,769
Guy:

Thanks for posting Tom’s survey map—I thought perhaps you had a copy of it! If possible, could you post a close-up view of just the immediate area around Mary Ann? It would be good to let folks see how the surveyors handled the forge site in 1861.

Best regards,
Jerseyman

Jerseyman,

I will have to look for the original scan he sent me. I tired zooming in on the stitched version and it is really poor. I will see what I can do tomorrow when I am not as tired. Today really wore me out.

Guy
 
Apr 6, 2004
3,624
565
Galloway
Great work, Jerseyman. Thank you. The maps were a pleasure to compare. Have you found anything out concerning when the cranberryin' and subsequent blueberryin' operations took place?
 

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
26,003
8,769
Jerseyman,

I don't have Tom's email to me in this mail program, so it may take me some time to find his original emial with the full size maps in it.

Guy
 
Tanner to Finley:

"How many times do I have to tell you Finley, its Juliustun, not Juliatown....get that woman off your mind!"

Bob:

I like your sense of humor!

The misspelling of Juliustown on the Finley and the Tanner maps may be simple errors on the part of the cartographer or the engraver. It is also entirely possible, however, that these incorrect spellings represent purposeful mistakes to protect the map’s copyright and to prevent unlawful reproduction of the map and/or its contents from plagiarism. During the middle ages and even into the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, the copying of map content was rampant and commonplace, as each cartographer or engraver sought to provide a map comprising the latest discoveries and best representations of coastlines and boundaries. As copyright for maps became standard, offering the copyright holder strong legal protections, the insertion of nihilatikel, in terms of false terrain or toponym labels, provided an added layer of security to the cartographer or the map’s publisher. These techniques are still employed today on modern road maps. Publishers like ADC, Hagstrom, Rand McNally, Gousha, and many others insert “Trap Streets” into their maps. Trap streets only exist on these published maps and cannot be found on the landscape. A careful studying of local road maps for the area where you live will often allow you to identify these trap streets.

Best regards,
Jerseyman
 

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
26,003
8,769
Guy:

Do you think I should write to Tom directly and ask him to insert the map detail? Would that be easier than have you searching for it?

Let me know your thoughts.

Best regards,
Jerseyman

Jerseyman,

That is up to you. I am wondering if he saved them? He scanned them I believe for me to merge and may be happy with the original and trashed them. Let me look tonight and if you do not hear from me by tomorrow that means I did not find it.

Guy
 

Teegate

Administrator
Site Administrator
Sep 17, 2002
26,003
8,769
I can't find his email. I know it was 3/22/2005 when I stitched them together, and my email backup in 1/2006 does not have it.

Guy
 

woodjin

Piney
Nov 8, 2004
4,358
340
Near Mt. Misery
Great report JM. As you might be aware, I have searched that area quite a bit. Thanks for posting the 1849 map. I had never seen that map before and it confirms areas where I (and others) have located ruin remains. They are little more than subtle depressions now. I would be very curious to see those photos from the 20's and 30's.

I could probably add a bit to the report but I want to hold off till I finish one particular exploration I have been planning in there for some time. I will complete it this summer for certain.

Jeff
 

oji

Piney
Jan 25, 2008
2,129
549
64
Browns Mills
Today in Browns Mills we had a presentation by a local historian and as I listened he started talking about the canals dug out in the woods below Upper Mill. He said that in the 1890's a Mr. Black built cranberry bogs in New Lisbon which were dry bogs. He came up with a plan to provide water to the bogs by building a massive dam on Bispham's Mill Creek raising the water level around 10 feet. Then he proceeded to dig a canal to his bogs which included a large wooden flume where it crossed the Mt. Misery stream. I bought a copy of his book which has a picture of the canal in use and one of the flume.
 
Today in Browns Mills we had a presentation by a local historian and as I listened he started talking about the canals dug out in the woods below Upper Mill. He said that in the 1890's a Mr. Black built cranberry bogs in New Lisbon which were dry bogs. He came up with a plan to provide water to the bogs by building a massive dam on Bispham's Mill Creek raising the water level around 10 feet. Then he proceeded to dig a canal to his bogs which included a large wooden flume where it crossed the Mt. Misery stream. I bought a copy of his book which has a picture of the canal in use and one of the flume.

Tom:

If you are coming to the Wing Ding tomorrow evening would you bring the book with you? I’d like to take a look at it.

Thanks!

Best regards,
Jerseyman
 
Top