Wikipedia says that they are seagulls.
Mark and Gabe:
While I agree that most of Weakipedia’s content represents true and correct data, I will not and cannot accept any of it at face value. If I EVER submitted an historic context or other documentation to a regulatory agency with a citation from Weakipedia, that governmental body would likely dismiss my report out-of-hand and I they would tell me to revise my source material and my text. As a result, I seldom consult this online source. For those not needing a high degree of accuracy and not required to use primary sources, then I’m sure Weakipedia fills the bill.
Sorry, Pine Baron, but I don’t consider Weakipedia an authoritative source for ANYTHING! The information is only as good as the person submitting it and anyone can go in and goof with it.
scriptor rerum Nova Caesarea
Dei memor, gratus amicus