Unless there is actual writing somewhere from that era where it is mentioned how the town got it's name, I would not believe it.
You are so right, Guy! Virtually all of the more recent books on the Pine Barrens are a regurgitation of previous works and most of the modern authors do not possess the necessary discernment to sort out what is correct and what is not within the older texts. God forbid these same authors should do some original research to find new information and to verify the accuracy of what past historians have written!
I read through the sections of texts related to Speedwell in
Ghost Towns and Quirky Places and it is rift with the errors promulgated by previous authors. As Oriental suggested in his post above, the story at Speedwell is more complicated than that presented by most authors, including Boyer. Regarding the name of Speedwell, in a review of John Harshberger's text, I could not find a single species of the Veronica genus native to the Pines, let alone Veronica virginica. Perhaps other members here have more comprehensive works on Pine Barrens botany that contains some species of Veronica. If so, please let me know.
Compounding the errors repeated in a number of these modern books, some of the volumes provide explicit directions to extremely fragile cultural sites in the Pine Barrens. If you combine these directions with the WNJ crowd, paint ballers, and idiots determined to perform acts of vandalism, you have a recipe for irrecoverable loss, with many cultural sites disappearing before our eyes. I don't have to recount to anyone here what has occurred at Brooskbrae.
Modern authors may hold egalitarian and possibly a naive view of other people, but time and again, enough folks have proven they cannot be trusted to do the right thing relative to the Pines.
I have pulled my files on Speedwell and hope to post a story about it in the near future.
Best regards,
Jerseyman