If you look back at macrosquat's history, they have a tradition of coming out with "new" os versions that are dogs, followed by versions that get it right. IIRC, ms-dos 4.0 was one of the dogs that replaced a perfectly functional ms-dos 3. 4.0 was shortly replaced by dos 5.0, which worked well.
As windoze came along, the early versions were pretty pathetic, particularly when compared to what apple offered at the time. They seemed to finally get things to run relatively smoothly with win98, then had the winME debacle. XP once again seemed to clean things up, provided you were not taking a snooze on security issues. My concern with vista is that it will be one of their dogs, only its become such a juggernaut there is no way to avoid it. I'm in the market for a new machine right now, and would do so today if I could get it with XP.
And on the browser issue, go with firefox... you won't regret it!
As windoze came along, the early versions were pretty pathetic, particularly when compared to what apple offered at the time. They seemed to finally get things to run relatively smoothly with win98, then had the winME debacle. XP once again seemed to clean things up, provided you were not taking a snooze on security issues. My concern with vista is that it will be one of their dogs, only its become such a juggernaut there is no way to avoid it. I'm in the market for a new machine right now, and would do so today if I could get it with XP.
And on the browser issue, go with firefox... you won't regret it!