None of this is true, you are wrong. Things have gotten worse and it is getting worse on a very steep uphill curve.
Prove it. Let's start with before and after photo's with the unedited EXIF data attached.
None of this is true, you are wrong. Things have gotten worse and it is getting worse on a very steep uphill curve.
Plus 1Well!
He's right and every one of us are wrong. I can say something about that, but I'm gonna take the high road.
The thing about certain 501c(3)'s is if there is no drum to beat, they tend to fade away. That is simply why there is always a drum, most times a perceived drum, that gets beat to a pulp.
I am for clean water, less impact on the environment, keeping the forest clean, pristine, safe, navigable, and monster trucks out the wetlands. Just like the PPA and Al.
The problem is the didactic, professorial tone. He came on here here to teach everyone, including people that may have a deeper understanding of the pine barrens than he does. He has some good points, but he refuses to have a dialogue.
It is common science, not my will. Science wins every time in my world.
None of this is true, you are wrong. Things have gotten worse and it is getting worse on a very steep uphill curve.
Ok, final word on this diatribe because I have a life to live, family to take care of, photographs to take, images to process, working with other photographers on printing and photoshop, planning for my NJ Museum exhibit in Oct., escorting concerned citizens around the Pinelands, talking with legislators about the problems in the Pinelands, going to Pineland Commission meetings, helping guide PPA as a board member, attending Freeholder meetings, volunteering for Pinelands Projects, assist with running a photo competition about the Pinelands, staying in contact with the DEP, and giving talks to nature, civic and photo clubs about the Pinelands, and enjoying a glass of wine at the end of the day. So you see why I have to end this discussion. I will get professorial here....STOP TALKING ABOUT THE PINELANDS, GET OUT THERE AND DO SOMETHING TO PRESERVE IT! GET A DIRECTED PURPOSE NOT JUST EVERYONES SCATTERED OPINIONS. HELP SAVE THIS MOST PRECIOUS PLACE WE HAVE IN THIS STATE!!!!! IF YOU DON'T YOU WILL NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO TALK ABOUT BECAUSE IT WILL BE UNDER 3' OF MUD FROM THE ORV CROWD IF THEY GET THERE WAY. WANT TO TALK ABOUT A GROUPS THAT WANTS TO RESTRICT ACCESS TO THE PINELANDS LOOK AT THEM. THEY WANT IT ALL TO THEMSELVES TO HELL WITH THE OTHER 8 MILLION SOULS IN NEW JERSEY.
bye for now,
Albert D. Horner, Photographer and Pinelands Advocate
No, there were built in provisions to accommodate the hunters.
One of my favorites was Jacklyn's email to Rob saying that people from this website would be mad at first but we'd all forget about it in time.
And Jaclyn was right, some please will be upset but it would be better than losing all privileges.
That is factually incorrect.
I am for clean water, less impact on the environment, keeping the forest clean, pristine, safe, navigable, and monster trucks out the wetlands. Just like the PPA and Al.
The problem is the didactic, professorial tone. He came on here here to teach everyone, including people that may have a deeper understanding of the pine barrens than he does. He has some good points, but he refuses to have a dialogue.
The thing about certain 501c(3)'s is if there is no drum to beat, they tend to fade away. That is simply why there is always a drum, most times a perceived drum, that gets beat to a pulp.