The Office of Planning Advocacy is forcing Pinelands Villages to become Priority Growth Zones in its Revisions to the State Planning Rules, even though this initiative is counter to the spirit of the Comprehensive Management Plan.
On March 16, 2012, I asked former Pinelands Commissioner Dan Kennedy, now Deputy Director at the Office of Planning Advocacy, this question, “Under what memorandum of understanding or memorandum of agreement is the Office of Planning Advocacy working with the Pinelands Commission?”
His response was,
S-M
On March 16, 2012, I asked former Pinelands Commissioner Dan Kennedy, now Deputy Director at the Office of Planning Advocacy, this question, “Under what memorandum of understanding or memorandum of agreement is the Office of Planning Advocacy working with the Pinelands Commission?”
His response was,
The operative MOU between the SPC and the PC is from 1999.
The "Advance Notice of Rules" in relation to the Pinelands does not list "villages" in the management area section b/c historically they have been treated as SPC centers (see Appendix C in the '99 MOU). If this new criteria based system is enabled, the plan would be to continue to treat these villages as centers, thus making them "Priority Growth Investment Areas." Clearly, the MOU would need to be reconsidered but the general relationship that has existed between the SPC and the PC is not broken and we are looking to strengthen and carry that positive relationship foward (sic).
You can feel free to share this response to anyone seeking this clarification.
DK
It is my understanding that the governor wishes that this issue be kept quiet until after the election. In my opinion, this change in management direction, endorsed by the Pinelands Commission, could potentially be the greatest threat to the Pinelands National Reserve since the jetport. Turtle, sewering will forever change the character of Pinelands Villages for the worse.S-M