Gabe and I have been having some discussions about iron slag. There's furnace slag and there's forge slag. This article also talks about foundry slag.
From what I've seen, there's two types of furnace slag. Slag that I've seen at Batsto, Hanover, and Federal Furnace (Lakehurst) looks like this:
Note the rust color, and how "spongy" the material looks. It seems to have had a number of air pockets. Also, in many cases furnace slag has pieces of charcoal embedded in it.
There's also the glass-like slag that can be found at Martha:
(MarkBNJ's Photo)
Obviously that's a very different type of slag than the first picture. I hypothesize that the glass-like slag comes from the hot blast method, where hot air was blasted in the charge, as opposed to the cold blast method, where the air blasted into the charge was the ambient temperature of the air around the furnace. The hot blast method was far more efficient than the cold-blast, and produced slag with less iron in it.
Finally, there's forge slag, which is made up of the impurities removed from the re-melted pig iron. This is more lava-like, smooth and uniform in texture and composition.
This is a piece of slag from Mary Ann Forge. Note the lack of oxidation indicating a lack of iron in the slag.
So why this thread? Well, mostly because I am not 100% sure about my theory of the glass-like slag from the hot blast method. The article I linked before says:
We have all three types of slag, but if this article is right, the slag that you can see at Hanover, Batsto, and Federal Furnace is forge slag, and the slag found at Mary Ann is foundry slag.
It's confusing, and I think it would be helpful to have a discussion about it and hopefully come to a conclusion.
From what I've seen, there's two types of furnace slag. Slag that I've seen at Batsto, Hanover, and Federal Furnace (Lakehurst) looks like this:
Note the rust color, and how "spongy" the material looks. It seems to have had a number of air pockets. Also, in many cases furnace slag has pieces of charcoal embedded in it.
There's also the glass-like slag that can be found at Martha:
(MarkBNJ's Photo)
Obviously that's a very different type of slag than the first picture. I hypothesize that the glass-like slag comes from the hot blast method, where hot air was blasted in the charge, as opposed to the cold blast method, where the air blasted into the charge was the ambient temperature of the air around the furnace. The hot blast method was far more efficient than the cold-blast, and produced slag with less iron in it.
Finally, there's forge slag, which is made up of the impurities removed from the re-melted pig iron. This is more lava-like, smooth and uniform in texture and composition.
This is a piece of slag from Mary Ann Forge. Note the lack of oxidation indicating a lack of iron in the slag.
So why this thread? Well, mostly because I am not 100% sure about my theory of the glass-like slag from the hot blast method. The article I linked before says:
Proof positive that a blast furnace got into operation was dense
glassy slag typically dark green or dark blue in color. This material
is glass and has been used by glassmakers who bought old furnace slag
piles. To date, not one piece of that has been found at Falling Creek.
The typical product of a forge is a bubbly slag with charcoal pieces,
iron lumps and other materials encased in a silica lump. At the end
of the day, each hearth at a forge was emptied. These items are
called skulls or mossers because they resemble a human skull. They
are discarded. The floodplain at Falling Creek is littered with these.
The typical product of a foundry is a denser, ropey or lava appearing
lump of slag. Both the foundry and the forge are huge producers of
waste products that are trodden into the ground around the operation
and are in fact hauled off to build up land from marshy areas.
We have all three types of slag, but if this article is right, the slag that you can see at Hanover, Batsto, and Federal Furnace is forge slag, and the slag found at Mary Ann is foundry slag.
It's confusing, and I think it would be helpful to have a discussion about it and hopefully come to a conclusion.