The northern pines one. No uproar, no surprise.
http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/...-project-clears-hurdle-in-application-process
http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/...-project-clears-hurdle-in-application-process
I'm am very upset by this decision. This is nothing less than political conspiracy and abuse of power, very similar to the bridgegate scandal. This governer of ours has a history of retribution towards those who cross him. Whatever I can do to help stop this thing, please update and include me so that I can help with the effort to prevent corruption of this most delicate ecosystem.Read the comments, this person makes sense of by saying the Pinelands Commission didn't approve it. The southern pipeline went to the Commission (not the Commission staff) and was not approved so they found a way to circumvent the process. What has to happen now is for the people of the area to get involved (just like the MAP issue).
The issue is that the authority of the pinelands commission was violated and completely circumvented by stacking the commision with members who will vote the way Governer Christie wants them to. It sets a precedent that makes the commission powerless and obsolete. There is tremendous pressure to develop the area. This is exactly what happened in the Long Island pine barrens. This marks the beginning of the end of the pinelands Reserve.I don't see what the problem is with having this pipeline. We need energy people unless you want to live in 1850. This pipeline will not
hurt the Pine barrens I don't see why people are so upset.
By the way, the bnl plant does not provide power in the pinelands Reserve.I don't see what the problem is with having this pipeline. We need energy people unless you want to live in 1850. This pipeline will not
hurt the Pine barrens I don't see why people are so upset.
By the way, the bnl plant does not service in the pinelands Reserve.I don't see what the problem is with having this pipeline. We need energy people unless you want to live in 1850. This pipeline will not
hurt the Pine barrens I don't see why people are so upset.
The Sierra Club is appealing the construction of the Southern Reliability Link
The Sierra Club is appealing the construction of the Southern Reliability Link, the natural gas pipeline planned to go through Burlington, Monmouth and Ocean Counties, including through the Pine Barrens.
http://www.njspotlight.com/stories/...ine-approval-another-environmental-challenge/
The Sierra Club is appealing the construction of the Southern Reliability Link, the natural gas pipeline planned to go through Burlington, Monmouth and Ocean Counties, including through the Pine Barrens.
http://www.capitalnewyork.com/artic...ond-pinelands-pipeline-could-spark-new-legal-Does the Pinelands Commission have authority over the SRL pipeline?
In the above attached article there is a paragraph that reads as follows: "The Southern Reliability Link (SRL) will support the safe, reliable, resilient distribution of natural gas to 83 municipalities throughout Monmouth, Ocean and Burlington counties, benefiting over one million people," the company said in literature about the project.
"We take pride in our long-standing reputation as a safe pipeline operator and socially responsible company," added Mr. Kvisle. "Construction and operation of the Keystone Pipeline system will continue to meet or exceed world-class safety and environmental standards. We are committed to being a reliable and safe operator that treats all stakeholders with honesty and respect."
TransCanada Corporation now says it appears approximately 16,800 gallons of oil have leaked in South Dakota since Saturday. The company says it reported the 400-barrel estimate Thursday to the National Response Centre and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Administration. It says the estimate is based on the excavation of soil to expose more than 100 feet of pipe and takes into account factors including oil observed in the soil and the potential area affected.
From 2010:
http://www.transcanada.com/announcements-article.html?id=1283846 keystone is tar sands oil bl england is natural gas
From 2016:
http://news10.com/2016/04/08/keystone-pipeline-leaks-17000-gallons-of-oil-in-south-dakota/
People really want unnecessary pipelines like the SRC and the one to BL England going through their towns?
ALL pipelines will eventually leak. You can only hope that when the pipeline to BL England leaks it does it in the forest and not somewhere where they're doing that horizontal drilling to get it under water.