I think you are correct there...shock value is a big factor. It's deeper than the shock value that that I am wondering about, though..I must admit that I wonder what a person's environment is. Where did they learn it? They realize, most assuredly, the hatred that stands behind a symbol of attempted mass genocide of a race, or they would not have chosen that symbol for its shock value. I visited the Holocaust memorial in Alliance twice recently, and that point was really driven home for me. How can you not shed tears when standing before you is such evidence of human cruelty, of fellow mankind?
And how can anyone take the symbols of that cruelty and hatred and pervert them into mere shock value--unless there is a disregard for that cruelty and hatred? Their latent feelings and beliefs toward others certainly reflect an indifference toward other's suffering to use such a loaded symbol for mere shock value--to use racial slurs of that intensity.
I think that shock value is only the tip of the iceberg, that there is a lot more going on inside those young heads...from people who feel they were wronged or slighted by someone (parents, teachers, friends, society). Put this way, I don't think that a person who was
not prejudiced would have chosen those symbols. And I think most of us are prejudiced in some way or form, though not necessarily racially.
I remember learning about four kinds of people--sorry, can't quote the book, it was a college textbook from years ago--those who are prejudiced AND discriminate, those who are prejudiced but do NOT discriminate, generally because it is not considered acceptable, those who are not prejudiced but DO discriminate (again, peer pressure, or not realizing they are doing it) and those who are not prejudiced and do not discriminate. Who admits to prejudice? It is socially unacceptable, and only the most extreme of us will admit to it-hence the value in using racial slurs for their shock value. If nothing else, it shows an utter disregard for the millions of lives that were lost and families torn apart as a result of prejudice--and to me, that blatant disregard stands as discrimination, wittingly or not. It is condoning prejudice, whether it is the intent or not. My dad used to always tell me that sitting on the fence is no different than condoning it. Inaction constitutes a choice and is in and of itself an action. I think that shock value represents more--what is going on inside of them, and not just on a personal level but also as a reflection of their view of society.
But that's just
my humble
opinion though, and everyone's going to have their own thoughts on it.
Sorry, I get a bit intense when it comes to this subject...I guess I just ridiculously dream of a fantasy world that is peaceful, where misjustices are righted, where people don't see color or shape or religion or anything else as barriers but celebrate differences...where people, of their own volition, get along and respect each other and life, human or not...
Off my soapbox now...
Renee