Thoughts on ATV use in New Jersey.

Discussion in 'The Slag Heap' started by Trailhead00, Dec 10, 2008.

  1. mudboy dave

    mudboy dave Explorer

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    949
    Likes Received:
    11
    Yes, I can see the difference, where I'm getting at, is where does it stop. I highly realize I'm on a PINE BARRENS website. i have been raised in the pine barrens and lived there for 27 years. I have also mentioned numerous times that I don't think there should be destructive 4x4 use in the pines, thats why i want to see something happen outside of the pines. I'm happy you see no problem with people buying their own property and destroying it.At least I know you wouldn't be one of the ones against it if this were to happen. I would love to see us unite and get that toxic dump of a spot and have mandatory wash-off spots before going home. I'm also happy to hear that you are more than likely in law enforcement, I highly appreciate the job that you do if I'm correct. However if you don't include going to the shooting range as a hobby, I take my words back. I'm simply stating that if we get a spot off of pinelands protected area, it would suck most of the people off of the pines and alot of destruction would halt. Believe me I love the pines, I spend about 20 hours of every week off the paved road and in the pines. The last thing I like to see is a set of ruts across a swamp, or be cruising along and hit a spot where some moron decided to do donuts with his mud tires.
     
  2. Aaron

    Aaron Explorer

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2007
    Messages:
    171
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sounds like we are more on the same page than off.

    I would love to see a privately run ORV park in NJ, somewhere that people could go safely and enjoy themselves. Getting the state to approve of anything will be an uphill battle at best. I wouldnt want to have to sit around and wait for the state to do anything.
     
  3. mudboy dave

    mudboy dave Explorer

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    949
    Likes Received:
    11
    I hear ya on that. In order to get the state to approve of such a thing approved, we need people such as those off of this site who are aware of the damage going on in the pines to help support when the time comes.
     
  4. Ben Ruset

    Ben Ruset Administrator
    Site Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2004
    Messages:
    7,297
    Likes Received:
    1,001
    At the end of the day, complaining on this website isn't going to help do anything. Complain to the DEP, complain to your state senator. If people started lobbying Washington or Trenton then perhaps you'd see some of the changes you want.

    Until then, this is just some website that a guy (me) runs that has no connections or affiliations with anybody who would have anything to say about the issue.
     
  5. woodjin

    woodjin Piney

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    4,283
    Likes Received:
    243
  6. LARGO

    LARGO Piney

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,518
    Likes Received:
    54

    But Ben,
    You've given us all us place to play. Think of all the children you've done so much good for! If you wanted one single way for this to be an income, give all the rest away free as usual but just incorporate a "venting" charge.
    You and Bill Gates will be chums in no time. If you sit back and watch this all with a straight face, bless you.
    Thanks for everything man.


    g.
     
  7. mudboy dave

    mudboy dave Explorer

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    949
    Likes Received:
    11
    you are absolutely correct, however its the people like yall that are viewed in some eyes as environmentalists, you are the ones that will make a difference if a poll goes up on having an offsite privately ran orv park.
     
  8. Ben Ruset

    Ben Ruset Administrator
    Site Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2004
    Messages:
    7,297
    Likes Received:
    1,001
    hah, dude the environmentalists HATE me because of my very pro ORV stance. go back and re-read some of the old threads, especially the one where Russ Juleig and I were debating the PPA's stance on ORV's.

    i have a tremendous respect for the environment, and ORV damage in the Pines infuriates me to no end, but I am a strong proponent that there needs to be legal places for people to ride, if only to keep most people out of sensitive areas where they shouldn't be.
     
  9. BIGGMIKE101

    BIGGMIKE101 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2008
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    do you mean those jeeps on you tube its ok what they do in the pines . and do you know the diffrence between enuro and a atv? not! THEY BOTH TARE UP THE GROUND . JUST LIKE THOSE 4X4 MONSTER TRUCKS.HOW ABOUT THOSE BULL DOZERS THE STATE USES FOR FIRE CUTS . I GUESS THATS FINE RIGHT! IF ATV GOT TO RIDE JUST THOSE FIRE CUTS ALONE I THINK SOME PEOPLE WOULD BE HAPPEY .OR DOES SOME DAM FROG LIVE THERE TO.
     
  10. Aaron

    Aaron Explorer

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2007
    Messages:
    171
    Likes Received:
    0
    I dont know what your asking me, between the caps and the 3rd grade spelling mistakes its hard to take anything you say seriously. You may do better to just smash your face on the keyboard and hit enter next time.

    I am praying that english is your second or third language.

    But no if an enuro ( enduro) where to TARE(tear) up the pines i wouldnt like that either. I dont know where the dam (damn) frogs live, sorry. Hopefully they dont have a written test to ride a atv( all terrain vehichle, ie quads, trikes and motor cross bikes).
     
  11. ZZ3GMC

    ZZ3GMC Scout

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2003
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    1

    But no,
    were to tear
    up the pines, I wouldnt like that either.
    an atv Maybe your right on this one.
    vehicle
    motocross bikes

    Not siding with anyone, just making a few corrections.
     
  12. mudboy dave

    mudboy dave Explorer

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    949
    Likes Received:
    11
    Is russ the one who tells the Jersey Devil camp stories? I'll do a search later. However without doing a search on old threads, I dont understand how anyone could not want a ORV park outside of the Pinelands barriers. It would be like a magnet that sucks alot of the guys outside of the pines. What it really comes down to is that until there is a place to go the damage to the pines is going to keep happening. I got some small private places I go but alot of people are not allowed to them due to they are small. Also the private places are more based towards 44" and taller tires not the little guy on 38s.
     
  13. mudboy dave

    mudboy dave Explorer

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    949
    Likes Received:
    11
    I can't say, since there is no link, that what they are doing is legal or not legal.. The enduro thing sorta gets to me as well. The way the state looks at it is that they can be driven on the road therefore they are legal. an atv cannot. Its that most of teh enduro riders are more respectful than a guy on his new 450r who is going 60 down the trail and throwing dirt and stoones 50 ft behind him. i know as a fact , just as any atv rider knows, that I could ride a quad through the woods and do minimal damage. The true question is who would be willing to follow the 20 mph rule? Who would be willing to stay on the designated trail? I personally think they go a little crazy with the bulldozers. As far as I understand they are only supposed to make cuts in between trees and only take out the underbrush. From what I have viwed that def is not the case. I have also seen people complain about the forest fire service on this site. Bottom line is that even if you could convince this whole site that ATV's should be allowed in the state forest, you would still have to convince the PPA and the state that it should be allowed. you have a better chance of crack being legal for 5 year olds to smoke than that. So instead of fighting a 100% loss of a battle. Fight for something realistic, a park outside of pinelands.
     
  14. dragoncjo

    dragoncjo Piney

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    1,350
    Likes Received:
    88
    You will find that many of the people that have power in this state concerning environmental issues don't partake in forums like this. As Ben stated sites like this and others have no pull at all when it comes to issues like we are discussing. If you want to get action done you really have to get in contact with the people who have power. I had the same issue with reptiles and amphibians, illegal collecting of them, habitat destruction, lack of habitat, etc. and got fed up with ranting on sites like this, so I went and contacted a land conservation organization and it worked out well for me....you got keep plugging away though.....good luck its much tougher when what your campaigning for is viewed as destructive.
     
  15. dragoncjo

    dragoncjo Piney

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    1,350
    Likes Received:
    88
    I would say a park not in NJ to be honest. The southern reaches of this state are equally fought for as the pine barrens by environmental groups. Lots of crucial areas along the Atlantic Flyway down there, and lots of endangered species.
     
  16. mudboy dave

    mudboy dave Explorer

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    949
    Likes Received:
    11
    I just wish those would understand that if something doesn't happen it's only gonna get worse. I know how this sorta thing works. Lets say the park police crack down on a spot of the pinelands that sees frequent ORV use, all the people are going to migrate elsewheres. This isn't anything new. The fines can keep increasing and what you'll get is 10 people out of 50 that will sell their trucks, within a year 20 more people have built new trucks that end up going out. Its a never ending cycle. Where I'm heading with this, is that hopefully someone in the higher ups will realize this and will compromise a piece of land to leave us alone on, when it would be us, the 4X4 enthusiasts paying for the lease, insurance and upkeep. The numbers I'm using are simply suggestive and are based on no stats. I myself no longer go mudding in the pines, I stay on trails that are on topography maps and that is it. I use my mud truck on private land, but that does not help to stop the guy who doesn't use his truck on private land and decides a swamp would make a nice mud run. I'm also not ranting on here but would rather have you guys understand what I'm trying to do. What I'm trying to do is not going to eliminate every non law abiding citizen from taking their truck out into the swamps, however it will make a huge fine and confiscation of a $20,000 mud truck less appealing.
     
  17. TheBronzeMan

    TheBronzeMan New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2007
    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bob, this is not true... If you talk to any professional forester they will be the first to point out that the use of New Jerseys public land was intended so that the average JOE had access to public land to recreate.

    This is also off of the Bass River state forest website:
    Note that this quote makes no mention to nature conservation... but it mentions wildlife and timber management... (back in 1905 that meant hunting and timber harvesting)... also note the only conservation mentioned is water conservation

    http://www.state.nj.us/dep/parksandforests/parks/bass.html

    This is also from that same state forest website. Again all CCC activities were very HIGH IMPACT like damming of wetlands and streams so to transform them into lakes or building of roads and trails over streams and swamps. If any of these initiatives were attempted today they would be met with total opposition from those that advocate closing the forest all together and allowing it to evolve back to total wilderness like the Parker Preserve.

    Bob, The point is the original purpose of the state forest directive was for recreation, hunting and timber harvesting... society and our choices as far as recreational activities go has also changed over time and the state has a responsibility to provide for those choices now and in the future.

    It's just a shame that a few in our community have chosen to hijack the original mission of the state forest initiative for their sole purpose of what they deem appropriate.

    There is also an original state forest mission document which is on paper and for some odd reason was never transfered to an electronic document... It's also kind of funny how in this electronic age history can be censored so easily.

    And no I'm not an ATV or 4x4 advocate... just someone that believes that all members of our society should be treated equally and fairly whatever their interest may be.
     
  18. Ben Ruset

    Ben Ruset Administrator
    Site Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2004
    Messages:
    7,297
    Likes Received:
    1,001
    Well, the thing is that ORV use is inherently destructive. Passive recreation (hiking, kayaking, etc.) is not.

    So you can make the argument that the ORV folks should not be able to destroy the environment because they'll be taking recreational options away from other groups.

    Which is the whole reason why there should be designated parks for people to ride, and ORV's should not be used anywhere but the parks.
     
  19. misclaims

    misclaims Explorer

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2008
    Messages:
    115
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree. In as much as Im kinda of a tree hugger, I do know that most people who enjoy ORVs also have a vested interest in preserving open space. Since that is the common denominator that binds, a compromise should be reached that benefits all of us who enjoy the outdoors and would rather see it preserved than plowed over. Having designated areas to ride would be much more adventageous to the environment as a whole then clearing out hundreds of acres for shopping centers, houses etc. The bulk of area would remain untouched with only the trail areas being affected.
     
  20. bigdog

    bigdog New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2017
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    I know this might be a long shot...…….how about Earle Naval Base open up some lands for ATV riding. There are thousands of acres not being utilized by anybody. I'm not sure how to go about this but I think that could be an answer to the problem